Scintillation detector's output

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darren93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Output
Darren93
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I'm looking at scintillation detectors and I'm quite confused to the output of the crystal. My notes just say emission output has intensity proportional to input energy. How though? I mean surely for the Photoelectric effect there is a huge spectrum of output energies depending upon shell jumped. If you consider 1 of these energies you would need multiple ionisations to occur to increase intensity output. If multiple are occurring, why? Additionally how can you get mostly PE absorptions at high energy, like ~140kev. Is it say a 140kev photon is absorbed, releasing a 138kev electron? That causes 69 further ionisations. That would make some sense but I'm still confused to what exactly is going on. Plus even with 70 ionisations taking place, if you consider 1 energy output there is only a chance of this occurring. It could be k-alpha, k-beta ect. Are all considered?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Darren93 said:
If you consider 1 of these energies you would need multiple ionisations to occur to increase intensity output.

Which you do.

Darren93 said:
If multiple are occurring, why?

Why not? Why should an electron suddenly stop ionizing after it's done so once?

And yes, the energy of ionization varies. But you're taking an average, and the Central Limit Theorem helps you here. Also, remember that all the energy has to end up somewhere. Double that energy, and twice as much has to end up somewhere as well.
 
I just found it odd that it was possible for a photon to undergo ~50 photoelectric absorption's all relatively instantaneously. Well with any large degree of occurrence. Turns out that's what the detector relies upon, thanks.
 
No, the photons hit electrons, those move through the material and lead to the excitations, losing a bit of energy each time.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top