Solving a Mystery: Understanding Scintillation Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter vertices
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Please look at the file problem.jpg. This is in reference to graph.jpg.

I'm trying to understand the solution (solutions.jpg).

I have a very trivial question. When a gamma ray photons enter the scintillator, it excites a electron, and a small fraction of the excitation energy is given out of visible/UV light during de-exitation. This is scintillation light.

It seems quite useless to me! I mean, what information does the scintillation light give us about the original photon? How on Earth can it give us information about the compton edge (when the energy transferred to the electron is a maximum).
 

Attachments

  • Graph.jpg
    Graph.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 567
  • Solution.jpg
    Solution.jpg
    11.5 KB · Views: 554
  • Problem.jpg
    Problem.jpg
    14.7 KB · Views: 565
Physics news on Phys.org
vertices said:
what information does the scintillation light give us about the original photon? How on Earth can it give us information about the compton edge (when the energy transferred to the electron is a maximum)
The incoming high-energy photon will generally induce several events in the defector. The number of events is proportional to the energy of the incoming photon. So the higher in energy the photon is, the higher intensity the light flash of the scintillation will be.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Back
Top