Score for Physics Subject Test & Strategies for Masters Program

  • Thread starter Thread starter t-money
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Test
AI Thread Summary
To gain admission to a mid-range master's program in physics, a strong GRE score is essential, especially given a GPA of 2.5 in physics and 2.6 in math. Aiming for at least the 80th percentile on the physics GRE can significantly enhance the chances of acceptance, even if the GPA is on the lower side. It's important to demonstrate a solid understanding of physics through coursework, having completed fundamental and upper-division classes. A compelling personal statement explaining the motivation for pursuing physics, especially transitioning from a molecular biology background, will also be beneficial. Consideration should be given to applying to lesser-known schools with strong programs, and improving academic performance in the final semester can help create a positive trajectory. Additionally, securing a position without financial support may be a possibility, allowing the opportunity to prove capability in graduate-level courses.
t-money
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Currently I am preparing to take the GRE and I have seen the states for the average physics student score on the quantitative, and I believe I can reach it. I also took a look at the Subject test, the score were pretty high.

My question is what is the minimum score you need to get in order to get into a decent masters program. I am not shooting for an MIT, Michigan, or CalTech, but a school in the mid range. I only have a GPA 2.5 in my physics classes and 2.6 in my math classes so I am fairly realistic of what my options are but I am dedicated and determined to learn physics. Fields of interest are applied , Solid State, or High Energy (atomic, plasma) physics.

What score do I need with my GPA?
Any advice on study strategys and prep work in general?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think a 2.5 is necessarily a bad gpa depending on what school you go to. At some schools an A in some math courses happens once in five years. I also know someone, one of my teachers, who got a chemistry degree at Cornell. He said that his ugpa was somewhere around 2.5 when he graduated (maybe lower than that). He got a job working in a lab at cornell and went to school part-time (took one class a semester) all the way up to Ph.D. and graduated with a 4.0. The difference was that he only had to handle one class. Thats a pretty good option because it was all paid for. I say this because getting support for your first year will be hard.

I would imagine that, and I am pretty much guessing, that 90% and up would make a strong case to many great schools that they should admit you with support. Also, consider apply to schools that not many people talk about such as in missouri (columbia). I know they are strong in math/physics and geometry. Finally, you could go to a school close to you via an extension program for a year. take two courses per semester do really good work (top student in class). then ask your teachers for help in getting into the program at that school. You could work part time to pay for that. Also since you haven't graduated yet try to do well this semester. An upperward spike is always better than the inverse.
 
I am currently finishing up a Major in Molecular Biology and Minoring in Physics for University of Washington (seattlle). I plan on going to a masters in Physics program similar to U.Memphis (Tennessee).

thanks for the input.
 
What will be most difficult for you is to convince a graduate school that you would be able to handle graduate level physics courses. You say you have a minor in physics, with a 2.5GPA in it, and also a low math GPA. Did you take a lot of physics courses or only the fundamentals plus a few others? Your preparation simply might not be good enough to start out at the level that is expected for incoming physics graduate students.

I think to get attention you would need to score pretty high on the physics GRE, I would say at least 80th percentile. It would also be to your benefit to have a personal statement including a good explanation of why you want to do physics (not even biophysics) after coming from a molecular biology background.

One thing that might happen is that you would get an offer of admission, but no assistantship. You would essentially be given the chance to prove yourself to the department, but on your own dime.
 
I have taken all the fundamentals and plus four more upper division physics classes. (Modern, Thermo, 2 math phyics courses) I also plan on taking EM II, Relativity, and Quantum mechanics before I graduate. The minor is more rigerous than it sounds, I already have finished my math requirements. I am prepared to pay for school, that is why I want to go through the masters program first. Hopefully I will do well and then possibly apply to the PH.D program.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top