Second Order Equations Can Anybody help me? Greatly appreciated

  • Thread starter Thread starter xinerz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Second order
xinerz
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Second Order Equations! Can Anybody help me?? Greatly appreciated!

Homework Statement


Interpret x(t) as the position of a mass on a spring at time t where x(t) satisfies

x'' + 4x' + 3x = 0.
Suppose the mass is pulled out, stretching the spring one unit from its equilibrium position, and given an initial velocity of +2 units per second.

(A) Find the position of the mass at time t.
(B) Determine whether or not the mass ever crosses the equilibrium position of x = 0.
(C) When (at what time) is the mass furthest from its equilibrium position? Approximately how far from the equilibrium position does it get?


Homework Equations


Previous problems on this homework set include transforming the initial value problem into a solution that looks partially like the following:

(example):
y = (1/3)e^(-4t) + (2/3)e^(-4t)



The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted the following:
x" + 4x' + 3x = 0 --> r^2 + 4r + 3 = 0, solved for r

r = -3 or -1
therefore y=e^(-3t) , y=e^(-t)
y(t) = Ae^(-3t) + Be^(-t)

solved for A and B both = -1/2

however, I'm not sure that this is right.

THANK YOU!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it satisfy the differential equation and boundary conditions? If so, it's probably right.
 
so to find the position at t, i just solve for y in terms of t? like
t = something

also, how would i show if the mass crossed equilibrium at x = 0?
 
No, y(t) is the position at t. And you seem to be using x and y to refer to the same thing. Try graphing the function to see if it crosses 0.
 
Or just set it equal to zero and see if there is a solution.
 
thanks! i got it you guys :)
thanks for all the help!
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top