I Second quantization and creation/annih. operators

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
766
I'd like some help with something in this introduction to second quantization ... http://yclept.ucdavis.edu/course/242/Class.html

They start by considering two operators ##a## and ##a^\dagger## such that ##[a,a^\dagger]=1## and they are adjoint to each other. Also introduced is a state ##|\alpha\rangle## that is an eigenvector of the (Hermitian) operator ##a^\dagger a##, so that
##a^\dagger a |\alpha\rangle = \alpha |\alpha\rangle##.

They go on to show that the state ##a|\alpha\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##a^\dagger a## with eignvalue ##\alpha-1##, and ##a^\dagger|\alpha\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##a^\dagger a## with eigenvalue ##\alpha-1##.

Up to this point I managed to follow the plot reasonably well.

But now they say that the above "implies" that

##|\alpha-1\rangle=\frac 1{\sqrt\alpha}\alpha|\alpha\rangle##
and
##|\alpha+1\rangle=\frac 1{\sqrt{\alpha+1}}\alpha|\alpha\rangle##

which I am absulutely unable to understand. How do they get this result? where do the square roots come from? Why is there an asymmetry in the square roots?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The square root come from the normalization, in order to have that the number of particle in the state ##\alpha##, so ##N_{\alpha}=a^{\dagger}a=n_{\alpha}##. I think that the asymmetry consist in that: in one case you have ##\sqrt{\alpha+1}## and in the other ##\sqrt{\alpha}## and not ##\sqrt{\alpha-1}## as the vector ##|\alpha-1\rangle##...
 
Thanks for the reply.. One reason I am confused is that, up to this point, they are talking about ##a## and ##a^\dagger## as two abstract operators with certain assumed properties -- they have not yet brought in any physics. And they seem to be saying that the square roots follow from (are implied by) the discussion so far. So I'm trying to understand how to derive those terms from what precedes.
 
  • Like
Likes Ssnow
Swamp Thing said:
##a^\dagger|\alpha\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##a^\dagger a## with eigenvalue ##\alpha-1##
I'm pretty sure it should be ##\alpha+1##, and that
Swamp Thing said:
##|\alpha-1\rangle=\frac 1{\sqrt\alpha}\alpha|\alpha\rangle##
and
##|\alpha+1\rangle=\frac 1{\sqrt{\alpha+1}}\alpha|\alpha\rangle##
should be
##|\alpha-1\rangle=\frac 1{\sqrt\alpha}\hat{a}|\alpha \rangle## and ##|\alpha+1\rangle=\frac 1{\sqrt{\alpha+1}}\hat{a}^{\dagger}|\alpha\rangle##.
This result can be obtained by demanding that the state kets are normalised - for example, we know that ##a^\dagger|\alpha\rangle## is proportional to ##|\alpha+1\rangle##, and we can determine the constant of proportionality by calculating the norm on both sides.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top