Secret Aerodynamics of B2 Stealth

  • Thread starter Thread starter sr241
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aerodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a friend's new aerodynamic concept aimed at reducing drag, which some believe resembles the B2 Stealth Bomber's design. Critics point out that the concept lacks sufficient grid detail in velocity vector plots and argue that sharp edges are impractical for high-speed aircraft due to structural limitations and thermal issues. The idea of a tilt-able leading edge was mentioned, but feedback indicated that sharp tips could lead to adverse effects like piercing the shock layer. Overall, while the concept is seen as innovative, significant technical challenges and design flaws were highlighted. The conversation emphasizes the importance of thorough analysis and structural considerations in aerodynamic design.
sr241
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
My friend had invented a new aerodynamic concept to reduce drag. My friends and colleagues say that his concept has striking similarity to B2 Stealth Bomber (elevation) design. I think his concept is novel and we contacted Northrop Grumman but there wasn’t any feedback. So I am inviting your esteemed opinion in this regard. For details on his concept follow the link http://sites.google.com/site/highlyaerodynamicdesign/

:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, by looking at your velocity vector plots, you have no where near enough grid for those runs. Aside from that, the reason that we run blunt tips is for structural reasons. You simply can't make, let alone run wings of that shape at high speeds.

Aside from that though, good work and it never hurts to keep thinking of new ideas.
 
I'm sure the guys at Grumman got a good laugh out of this.
 
minger said:
First, by looking at your velocity vector plots, you have no where near enough grid for those runs. Aside from that, the reason that we run blunt tips is for structural reasons. You simply can't make, let alone run wings of that shape at high speeds.

Aside from that though, good work and it never hurts to keep thinking of new ideas.

Some supersonic wings have sharp leading edges. and most of the airfoils have sharp trailing edge. Actually I was planning a tilt-able leading edge that is always parallel to aircraft direction even during climb.
 
Words cannot express how disappointing your website and analysis is.
 
Last edited:
sr241 said:
Some supersonic wings have sharp leading edges. and most of the airfoils have sharp trailing edge. Actually I was planning a tilt-able leading edge that is always parallel to aircraft direction even during climb.

From the very limited amount I have learned about supersonic aerodynamics, a sharp tip (or edge) can be a bad idea because it pierces the shock layer, exposing the aircraft to high temperature gradients. Highly supersonic aircraft (such as a spacecraft re-entering the atmosphere) have to utilize a blunt body that uses the shock layer for insulation, because anything piercing the shock layer would melt off.

From an FEA standpoint, a sharp tip like that will cause a singularity in your code which needs to be accounted for.
 

Thread 'Space Stuff and Launch Info'

Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top