Sector angle and segment area just given only 2 variables ?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the sector angle and segment area of a circle requires the radius and the chord length. The sagitta length can be determined using the formula S = r - √(r² - (1/2)l²), where r is the radius and l is the chord length. The sine function is applied to find the half sector angle, using the relationship sin(1/2 sector angle) = (1/2)l/r. This discussion focuses on deriving these values from the given variables. Understanding these calculations can aid in solving problems related to circular segments.
CGUE
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Is there a way to calculate the sector angle and segment area of a circle just given only the radius and the length of the circle ?
So far I can only calculate the sagitta length using the radius and length of the chord i.e.

S = r - \sqrt{r^2 - \frac{1}{2}l^2}

Where r is the radius of the circle and l is the length of the chord.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi CGUE ! :smile:

sin = opp/hyp …

sin 1/2 sector angle = 1/2 l/r :smile:
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top