I Seeking better explanation of some quantum stats formulae

SamRoss
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
36
TL;DR Summary
Reading Griffiths. He derives some formulas but I'm not following.
In "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics", Griffiths derives the following formulae for counting the number of configurations for N particles.

Distinguishable particles...
$$ N!\prod_{n=1}^\infty \frac {d^{N_n}_n} {N_n !} $$

Fermions...
$$ \prod_{n=1}^\infty \frac {d_n!} {N_n!(d_n-N_n)!}$$

Bosons...
$$\prod_{n=1}^\infty \frac {(N_n+d_n-1)!} {N_n!(d_n-1)!}$$

In the above, ##N_n## stands for the number of particles in the nth state and ##d_n## stands for the degeneracy of the nth state. My confusion is not with the mathematics of combinatorics but only how it is being used here. Griffiths speaks of "picking particles" and "bins" and I'm only vaguely able to follow his argument. Furthermore, I can't search for these formulae online because they are not named in the text and I have been unsuccessful with searches for "quantum statistics", "configurations", etc. Can anyone here recognize these formulae and point me to a derivation of them? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
And found all your expressions -- with a little more explanation

Awesome. Thanks!
 
You should try working these expressions out on your own as they are very common in statistical mechanics.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top