Seeking the truth behind existence of charge: An Intricasy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Neelesh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Existence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Klein-Kaluza theory and its implications for understanding charge through the lens of fifth-dimensional electromagnetic interactions. It posits that particles in the Dirac Vacuum exhibit translatory and rotational motion, influencing their interactions based on spin direction. Key points raised include the lack of charge in neutrinos despite their spin, the absence of charge in photons, and the relativity of charge based on the observer's frame of reference. These insights challenge conventional notions of charge and its dependence on particle spin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Klein-Kaluza theory
  • Dirac Vacuum concepts
  • Quantum spin and its implications
  • Electromagnetic field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Klein-Kaluza theory on modern physics
  • Investigate the properties of neutrinos and their role in particle physics
  • Study the behavior of photons in electromagnetic fields
  • Research the concept of charge relativity in different reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and students interested in advanced quantum mechanics and the fundamental nature of charge in particle interactions.

Neelesh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
According to Klein Kaluza theory of fifth dimension (followed by string theory),
there is an elecromagnetic dimension in which every particle of Universe (in Dirac Vacuum) perform translatory and rotational motion due to which they drag the e-m dimension. Thus if any two particles are placed quite distance apart due to spinning of both, they attract or repel each other depending on their spinning. If they've spins in same direction they repel each other and vice versa which is nothing but we can say it as charge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so:

1. If, spin is the reason of the "real charge", then why neutrinos don't have charge even they've spin.

2. Photons also have spin but noc harge and also have a sinusoidally varying e-m field.

3. Charge is not a relative quantity. Consider a condition- a light particle(A) is
revolving around a heavy particle(B), B has a spin and same angular velocity
as that of revolution of A. Now, from the respective of A, B isn't spinning,
does it mean that from respective of A there's no chargeon B?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K