Seeking the truth behind existence of charge: An Intricasy

  • Thread starter Neelesh
  • Start date
  • #1
3
0
According to Klein Kaluza theory of fifth dimension (followed by string theory),
there is an elecromagnetic dimension in which every particle of Universe (in Dirac Vacuum) perform translatory and rotational motion due to which they drag the e-m dimension. Thus if any two particles are placed quite distance apart due to spinning of both, they attract or repel each other depending on their spinning. If they've spins in same direction they repel each other and vice versa which is nothing but we can say it as charge.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
I don't think so:

1. If, spin is the reason of the "real charge", then why neutrinos don't have charge even they've spin.

2. Photons also have spin but noc harge and also have a sinusoidally varying e-m field.

3. Charge is not a relative quantity. Consider a condition- a light particle(A) is
revolving around a heavy particle(B), B has a spin and same angular velocity
as that of revolution of A. Now, from the respective of A, B isn't spinning,
does it mean that from respective of A there's no chargeon B?
 

Related Threads on Seeking the truth behind existence of charge: An Intricasy

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
70
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Top