Seismic Ground Response Parameters

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding seismic ground response parameters in cohesive and cohesionless soils, specifically addressing how soil thickness, density, and grain size affect shear wave velocity and frequency. Key points include the relationship between soil thickness and frequency, with thicker soils leading to lower frequencies, and the observation that less dense soils like clay have higher amplification and lower shear wave velocities compared to denser soils. The conversation also touches on the effects of grain size and density on shear wave velocity, emphasizing that each soil type has a unique frequency response. Participants suggest that the topic requires further input and exploration from the community. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of soil behavior in seismic contexts.
HarryKoh
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
⚠ this thread is closed ⚠
Hey guys, recently I have do some self-study on the ground response parameters on cohesive and cohesionless soil.. I made some deduction but I cannot confirm if it is correct or not, thus needing the help from the PF community. The deduction is as follows;

I need explanation for the occurrence of this phenomena..
(1) As the thickness of the soil increases, the frequency will decrease. Why?
(2) Amplification is higher in less dense/cohesive soil (e.g clay) than denser soil thus making cohesive soil to have a lower shear wave velocity, Vs. Why?
(3) As thickness of the soil increases, the shear wave velocity will also increase. Why?
(4) How does grain size affects the shear wave velocity?
(5) How does density affect the shear wave velocity?
(6) From the image, we can see that sand produce a steady amplification, and that amplification on clay is getting bigger and bigger..Why?

Thanks for your help! If any statement is wrong above, please do let me know, thanks! :D
 

Attachments

  • 20160406_170621.jpg
    20160406_170621.jpg
    19.1 KB · Views: 449
Engineering news on Phys.org
HarryKoh said:
Hey guys, recently I have do some self-study on the ground response parameters on cohesive and cohesionless soil.. I made some deduction but I cannot confirm if it is correct or not, thus needing the help from the PF community. The deduction is as follows;

I need explanation for the occurrence of this phenomena..
(1) As the thickness of the soil increases, the frequency will decrease. Why?
(2) Amplification is higher in less dense/cohesive soil (e.g clay) than denser soil thus making cohesive soil to have a lower shear wave velocity, Vs. Why?
(3) As thickness of the soil increases, the shear wave velocity will also increase. Why?
(4) How does grain size affects the shear wave velocity?
(5) How does density affect the shear wave velocity?
(6) From the image, we can see that sand produce a steady amplification, and that amplification on clay is getting bigger and bigger..Why?

Thanks for your help! If any statement is wrong above, please do let me know, thanks! :D
Hello, let me start by saying I am not a soil guy, but have done some seismic work.
On number (1) are you talking about the aggregate density of the soil?
Also sound waves in mediums attenuate not amplify.
From what I have seen, all soil types have a frequency that they will go plastic.
I have heard this called the modulus of elasticity, and I think is defined by Young's modulus.
http://www.geotechdata.info/parameter/soil-young%27s-modulus.html
Vibroseis trucks generally sweep from 0 to about 110 hz,
I had to find a video with the camera on a tripod to show you what I am talking about.

At about the 38 second mark they pass the frequency where the greatest energy passes
in that weathering layer. At that point the ground is going plastic under the tripod, so the tripod vibrates.
Every combination of soil will have it's own frequency, but they all fall into that band.
I understand that the attenuation above 110 hz in most soil types is greater than 3 db per octave.
Within the very limited range of frequencies, many of the standard wave equations apply,
except that "c" is the speed of sound in that medium.
I hope this helps some!
 
Homework-type exercise, requiring more member input than shown in opening post.

➖ Thread closed ➖ [/size]
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top