Testing Selecting a Graduate Advisor: Tips and Tests for Making the Right Choice

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aero51
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
AI Thread Summary
Selecting a graduate advisor is a critical decision that can significantly impact academic success and personal satisfaction. It's essential to balance research interests with personality compatibility. Engaging potential advisors with specific questions can help gauge their expectations regarding meeting frequency, guidance style, and flexibility in research topics. For advisors whose interests are not fully aligned, inquiring about the feasibility of pursuing related research can clarify potential compatibility. A practical approach is to request a short-term project to assess both the research area and the advisor's mentorship style. This allows for an informed decision without long-term commitment. Graduate students should remember they have the autonomy to choose their dissertation topics and research directions, emphasizing the importance of finding an advisor who supports their individual needs and goals.
Aero51
Messages
545
Reaction score
10
I'm at the point in my graduate career where I must select an advisor within the coming months. I have about 4 professors narrowed down based on research interests and experience. One professor I get along with very well, but believe our academic interests are not exactly aligned. Another has more similar research interests but our personalities are not the best match. I am trying to think of ways to narrow down my selection. What "tests" should I try on potential advisors to help guide me in a selection.


Note: by tests I don't mean literal exams. That would be absurd. Think of a test as a clever question, body language, reaction to a situation, etc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is quite important. I personally feel that it is better to have an advisor with a similar personality than to have an advisor with similar interests (provided that the interests of your advisor are not very far off). If your personalities don't match, then the next few years could end up really bad. For example, it could be that you are an independent person. An advisor that is pushy might not be in your best interest.

A thing you should certainly ask your advisors is how the coming years are going to look like. that is: do they expect to see you every day? How often do you meet each other? How much guidance should you expect? etc.

To the advisor whose interests don't completely match yours, you should ask what he would think if you would do research in something different (but close). Just tell him that your interests don't seem to match up completely and ask whether that is a significant problem.
 
Don't forget that picking an advisor is not a one-time deal. You are allowed to change your choice.

A good idea is to figure out who you are most interested in working with, and ask him to give you a short term (~1 year) project to test whether or not you really want to do research in that field (also, be sure that the test project really is only a 1 year project; these things have a tendency to run on). If you like the research and you get along with the advisor, great. If you don't like the research or you can't stand your advisor, then no harm done; at worst, you've lost a year, and if you switch to an advisor in a related field you haven't even lost that.

One of the traps that grad. students fall into is thinking that they have less freedom than they actually do. Remember that, at the end of the day, the responsibility for the research you do as a grad. student is yours. You pick your dissertation topic, you do the research, you write the dissertation.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
112
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Back
Top