Self-adjoint matrix, general form

Jakub Tesar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am looking for the general form of 2x2 complex transformation matrix.

I have the article, that says "the relative position of a self-adjoint 2x2 matrix B with respect to A as a reference (corresponding to the transformation from the eigenspaces of A to the eigenspaces of B) is determined by two real-valued parameters."

But the general form of self-adjoint matrix is determined by four real-valued parameters (or three if I limit the matrix by the detU=1), isn't it?

I tried to start with the matrix derived from the Bloch vector, but I doubt, that it's the most general case:
upload_2016-1-29_14-44-33.png


I expect I just made a mistake somewhere, but I can't find the right place.
Thank you,
Jakub
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They're probably talking self-adjoint unitary matrices, which do have just two real degrees of freedom.

Your formula misses the Pauli Z matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes Jakub Tesar
Self-adjoint is a mathematical description. A general description is as follows:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, a Hermitian matrix (or self-adjoint matrix) is a square matrix with complex entries that is equal to its own conjugate transpose—that is, the element in the i-th row and j-th column is equal to the complex conjugate of the element in the j-th row and i-th column, for all indices i and j:

047bf7f688e415bf724ddd891712758c.png
or
eaf2c338093020405a336a2ed8ffaf63.png
, in matrix form.
 
  • Like
Likes Jakub Tesar
Sorry, I do not look for self-adjoint matrix, just unitary (wrong title) -- for the general form of transformation between two different bases in the 2x2 Hilbert space.

I was thinking in the same direction Stirlanc, but I wonder how I can add Pauli Z matrix and still have unitary matrix with only 2 real parameters.
 
Let's see. A general ##\mathbb{C}^{2 \times 2}## matrix,
$$M=\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix}$$
has 4 independent complex, i.e., 8 independent real parameters. Now for the matrix to be unitary you must have
$$M^{\dagger} M=\mathbb{1},$$
which implies that both the columns and the rows are two orthonormal vectors. Thus you have the constraints
$$|a|^2+|b|^2=|c|^2+|d|^2=|a|^2+|b|^2=|c|^2+|d|^2=1,$$
i.e., of the 4 moduli of the numbers only 2 are indpendent.
Then you have
$$a^* c + b^* d=a^* b+c^* d=0,$$
which are two more constraints, i.e., of the 8 real parameters only 4 are independent.

Depending on your problem different parametrizations are more or less convenient. One is to use the Lie algebra of the unitary group U(2), leading to
$$M=\exp(\mathrm{i} \varphi) \exp(\mathrm{i} \vec{\alpha} \cdot \vec{\sigma}/2),$$
where ##\vec{\sigma}## are the three Pauli matrices, and ##\vec{\alpha} \in B_{2\pi}(0)##, ##\varphi \in [0,2 \pi[##.
 
  • Like
Likes Jakub Tesar
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top