Self interaction, conserving energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of understanding how a charged particle interacts with its own electromagnetic field in classical electromagnetism. It raises questions about energy conservation, particularly when an accelerating charge emits energy into the field but does not seem to lose energy from its own field. The complexity of electron self-interaction is highlighted, noting that even physicist Richard Feynman struggled to find a definitive solution using various potential theories. The Abraham-Lorentz self-force is mentioned as a factor that complicates the acceleration of charged particles, indicating that additional forces must be considered. Overall, the conversation underscores the intricacies of classical theories in explaining radiation and self-interaction of charges.
jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
I've learned that you cannot deal with the interaction of a charge with its own field in classical electromagnetism. It is said, that this is simply the case with classical theory, and you have to deal with it. But how can this be? If accelerating charge is giving energy to the field, then it should be losing energy itself, but how can it lose energy if it doesn't feel its own field? Is the energy really conserved in classical theory, when one attempts to explain the radiation?

I have never seen an equation, that would tell strictly, what kind of acceleration a charge would suffer with a given rate of change of momentum. I mean, that at least the rate of change of the speed should be less than if particle had no charge. How much less, precisly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jostpuur said:
I've learned that you cannot deal with the interaction of a charge with its own field in classical electromagnetism. It is said, that this is simply the case with classical theory, and you have to deal with it. But how can this be? If accelerating charge is giving energy to the field, then it should be losing energy itself, but how can it lose energy if it doesn't feel its own field? Is the energy really conserved in classical theory, when one attempts to explain the radiation?

I have never seen an equation, that would tell strictly, what kind of acceleration a charge would suffer with a given rate of change of momentum. I mean, that at least the rate of change of the speed should be less than if particle had no charge. How much less, precisly?
Electron self-interaction seems to be one of those aspects of physics that has no right answer, just different ways of looking at it. Feynman spent his life trying to analyse electron self - interaction using retarded potentials, advanced potentials and half-retarded, half-advanced and could not find a solution. See his http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html" .

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jostpuur said:
I've learned that you cannot deal with the interaction of a charge with its own field in classical electromagnetism. It is said, that this is simply the case with classical theory, and you have to deal with it. But how can this be? If accelerating charge is giving energy to the field, then it should be losing energy itself, but how can it lose energy if it doesn't feel its own field? Is the energy really conserved in classical theory, when one attempts to explain the radiation?
There is a section in Jackson's 3rd Edition of his EM text. That section is called "Radiative Reaction Force from Conservation of Energy."

Seek your aswer there. Leave it to say that there is an additional force to overcome which is caused by the attempt to accelerate the charged particle. This is known as the Abraham-Lorentz self-force. This is a complex subject and has some quirks to it and I don't know the subject well enough to explain it solidly to others. I recommend that you look this up, perhaps at the library or a search on Google.

Pete
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top