Can self-training lead to becoming a successful inventor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EngTechno
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To become a successful inventor, self-training techniques are crucial alongside formal education. While attending prestigious universities like MIT or CalTech can provide valuable resources and networking opportunities, self-motivation and practical experience are equally important. Engaging in hands-on projects, collaborating with peers, and continuously learning about patent processes and market needs can enhance inventive skills. The patenting process is complex and costly, often requiring thousands of dollars and legal assistance, which underscores the importance of creating inventions that companies find valuable enough to license rather than circumvent. Ultimately, the focus should be on developing innovative ideas that meet market demands while navigating the intricacies of patent law effectively.
EngTechno
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
What are the best self-training techniques to become an inventor? I am a 25 year-old undergraduate Mechanical-Aerospace engineering student. I look forward to become a patent-holder within 10 years. Do I have to get a degree from Top Universities like MIT, CalTech and others in addition to self-motivation? What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EngTechno said:
What are the best self-training techniques to become an inventor? I am a 25 year-old undergraduate Mechanical-Aerospace engineering student. I look forward to become a patent-holder within 10 years. Do I have to get a degree from Top Universities like MIT, CalTech and others in addition to self-motivation? What do you think?


The only thing you need is two sets of brains and inspiration + the will to work work work...


marlon :approve:
 
And then you got to pay thousands of $ and wait years for it to be evaluated. And after all that, you'll need loads of lawyer $ if you got to defend it.
 
Patents aren't that special. There are so many variation of processes that it's trivial to think of something that can be patented. The real challenge is to come up with something that companies find cheaper to license from you, instead of designing around the patent and/or threatening you with a cross licensing scheme. Patents themselves cost around $4,000 w/o a patent lawyer. With a patent lawyer it can run up to $12,000.
 
I suspect one can involve himself in international issues as well.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top