Send Radio Signals to Other Stars: Accounting for Arrival

  • Thread starter Thread starter kindaroomy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
When sending a radio signal to another star, it's crucial to consider the star's position at the time of arrival, especially for distant targets like Messier 13, which is 26,000 light-years away. While a parabolic dish can focus the signal, its effectiveness diminishes over vast distances due to the spreading of radio waves. For nearby celestial bodies, such as Mars, the movement is negligible within the signal's travel time. The Arecibo Message serves as an example, highlighting that stars can significantly shift positions over thousands of years. Ultimately, the broad nature of the signal may mitigate the need for precise targeting in many cases.
kindaroomy
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
If I wanted to send a radio signal to another star, shouldn’t I have to account for where the star will be when the message arrives?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
kindaroomy said:
If I wanted to send a radio signal to another star, shouldn’t I have to account for where the star will be when the message arrives?
If you send it with a parabolic dish, yes, but if you send it in a way that is not as directional (just an antenna, for example) no.
 
just a quck folow up question russ, wouldn't the parabolic dish still not make much of a difference? i mean, the radio waves should still spead out enough thoughout space right? unless one was trying to reach Mars. but Alpha-Centari should just be "There it is. Point and shoot!" right"
 
Yes, the stars we can see with the naked eye don't move much and it is difficult to get a very tight beam of radio waves. Heck, Mars doesn't even move much in the few minutes it takes for a signal to reach it.
 
I was reading up on the first organized message sent into space, the Arecibo Message. It was sent to Messier 13 some 26,000 ly away. I am guessing under this scenario you'd have to account for movement, as the stars can orbit around the galaxy quite a bit in 26,000 years. Or would this message still be broad enough to cover it?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top