# Sequence (a_n)^2 ->0 implies (a_n) ->0 ?

## Homework Statement

Let an be an infinite sequence.

1) Is it true that an2 ->0 as n->∞
=> an ->0 as n->∞ ?

2) Is it also true that an ->0 as n->∞
=> an2 ->0 as n->∞ ?

N/A

## The Attempt at a Solution

Both SEEM to be true to me, but I am not sure why. What is the simplest way to explain these? I want to understand intuitively.

Any help is appreciated!

Related Calculus and Beyond Homework Help News on Phys.org
HallsofIvy
Homework Helper
Saying that $a_n\to 0$ means that, given any $\epsilon> 0$ there exist N such that if n> N, $|a_n- 0|= |a_n|< \epsilon$.

Saying that $a_n^2\to 0$ means that, given any $\epsilon> 0$ there exist N such that if n> N, $|a_n^2- 0|= |a_n^2|< \epsilon$.

If you know that $a_n\to 0$ then, given any $\epsilon> 0$ there exist N such that if n> N, $|a_n|< \sqrt{\epsilon}$. From that it follows that, for n> N, $|a_n^2|< \epsilon$.

Conversely, if you know that [itxex]a_n^2\to 0[/itex] then, given any $\epsilon> 0$, there exist N such that if n> N, $|a_n^2|< \epsilon^2$. From that it follows that, for n> N, $|a_n|< \epsilon$.

More generally, if $a_n\to a$ and f(x) is continuous in some neighborhood of a, then $f(a_n)\to f(a)$.

More generally, if $a_n\to a$ and f(x) is continuous in some neighborhood of a, then $f(a_n)\to f(a)$.
Thanks! But I have a question, then.
an2 ->0 as n->∞
=> an ->0 as n->∞

But the square root function is NOT continuous at 0, and it's definitely NOT continuous in a neighbourhood of 0, so the theorem does not apply??
It's weird...

Last edited:
Dick
Homework Helper
Halls said 'more generally'. sqrt is one-sided continuous at 0, from the positive side. If you don't have special theorems about one sided continuity, then just pay attention to his suggestions about an epsilon delta proof. Isn't that what you meant about "SEEM to be true"?

I have a question about the proof.

Saying that $a_n\to 0$ means that, given ANY $\epsilon> 0$ there exist N such that if n> N, $|a_n- 0|= |a_n|< \epsilon$.

Because of the word "ANY", we can take epsilon here to be $\sqrt{\epsilon}$, and there would still exist some N, right?

Last edited:
Dick