We have recurrent sequence of integer number a_{1},a_{2},...
a1=1, a2=2
a_{n}=3a_{n-1}+5a_{n-2} for n=3,4,5,...
Is integer number k>=2, that (a_{k+1}*a_{k+2}) mod a_{k} = 0 ?
We have recurrent sequence of integer number a_{1},a_{2},...
a1=1, a2=2
a_{n}=3a_{n-1}+5a_{n-2} for n=3,4,5,...
Is integer number k>=2, that (a_{k+1}*a_{k+2}) mod a_{k} = 0 ?
Please for quick help :)
You need to clarify your post A(2) = 2. A(3)*A(4) = 11*43 is not divisible by A(2). Do you mean to ask whether for some integer n that a_{n}|a_{n+1}*a_{n+2}?
Last edited:
#3
terafull
3
0
Yes. I must find some integer n (exactly k), where this modulo statement is true.
Thanks for reply :)
#4
dodo
695
2
I was doing some number crunching to reduce the possibilities for k, but I'm still far from an answer.
So far, I get the following:
If b, a, 3a+5b, 14a+15b, ... are contiguous elements of the sequence, then we see that, if a_n=b is even, then a_{n+3}=14a+15b is also even. And since there happens to be an even element among the first 3 (namely, a_2=2, then one every 3 elements from that point on (a_5, a_8, a_{11}...) will be even too.
In short, since a_2=2,
n \equiv 2 \ (mod\ 3) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 2|a_n
Which means that the desired k cannot be congruent to 2 (mod 3), because a_k would have a factor 2 that (a_{k+1} * a_{k+2}) doesn't have.
and given that a_3=11, a_4=43, a_5=23\ .\ 8, a_6=13\ .\ 59 \ \mbox{and}\ a_8=17\ .\ 794, we also have
n \equiv 3 \ (mod\ 12) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 11|a_n
n \equiv 4 \ (mod\ 11) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 43|a_n
n \equiv 5 \ (mod\ 11) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 23|a_n
n \equiv 6 \ (mod\ 12) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 13|a_n
n \equiv 8 \ (mod\ 18) \ \ \Rightarrow \ \ 17|a_n
and all these conditions (including the one above about even numbers) must be avoided by your k candidate. However, there are still plenty of valid candidates remaining.
It is well known that a vector space always admits an algebraic (Hamel) basis. This is a theorem that follows from Zorn's lemma based on the Axiom of Choice (AC).
Now consider any specific instance of vector space. Since the AC axiom may or may not be included in the underlying set theory, might there be examples of vector spaces in which an Hamel basis actually doesn't exist ?