Series Resistive Circuit Problem Solution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to a resistive circuit, specifically addressing whether the resistors can be considered in series or not. Participants explore circuit analysis techniques, including nodal analysis, and clarify the identification of nodes within the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the resistors can be assumed to be in series due to the presence of other loops in the circuit.
  • Another participant suggests simplifying the circuit before proceeding with analysis.
  • Participants discuss the identification of nodes, with one participant initially identifying four nodes, while another corrects this to two distinct nodes based on contiguous conducting paths.
  • There is a discussion about the paths current can take from one node to another, with one participant asserting there are three parallel paths for current flow.
  • One participant attempts to set up a current equation but is advised that their current directions may be confused and that they need to clarify their reference node for potentials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the identification of nodes and the configuration of the circuit, indicating that multiple competing interpretations exist. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to analyzing the circuit.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the assumptions regarding the circuit configuration, the identification of nodes, or the setup of the current equation. There are also unresolved questions about the impact of the current source on the analysis.

utnip123
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://puu.sh/6PZNJ.png

Homework Equations



This is supposed to be a pretty easy problem, but can i assume the resistors are in series? The other loops are throwing me off.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you done to try to resolve whether the resistors are in series or not?
 
Well in the other two loops there are no circuit elements, and there is only one current source. Should i instead go through this with nodal analysis?
 
The circuit can be simplified. It might be best to do that before anything else.

How many distinct nodes are there in the circuit?
 
I believe I'm seeing 4 nodes, 1 at the left and right, and 2 in the middle.
 
utnip123 said:
I believe I'm seeing 4 nodes, 1 at the left and right, and 2 in the middle.

Nope. Remember that a node consists of a contiguous conducting path. Everywhere that path goes is part of the same node.

Take some highlighting markers and highlight the contiguous conducting paths (wires). How many different colors do you need to use?
 
Oh starting from the Current source, I see 2 different paths.
 
utnip123 said:
Oh starting from the Current source, I see 2 different paths.

Right. So there are two distinct nodes.

Now try this: Call the two nodes 'a' and 'b', corresponding to the terminals that are already labeled. Now, everywhere wires meet on a given node place the same label. Then, start a new sketch, placing two dots called a and b to begin with (they will represent your two nodes). Now, for each component in the original circuit, place it on the new sketch with the same node connections. So, for example, the 20 Ω resistor connects to both node a and node b in the original. Place it onto your new sketch preserving those associations. Do the same for all the other components, too. How does it look now?
 
I think i see where this is going. They are all connected in the same way. Aren't they all short circuited?
 
  • #10
utnip123 said:
I think i see where this is going. They are all connected in the same way. Aren't they all short circuited?

Yes, they're all connected in the same way. No, they are not short circuited. To be short circuited would imply a wire connection between a and b. But that's not possible if you identified them as distinct nodes:

attachment.php?attachmentid=66451&stc=1&d=1391978765.gif


If a and b were shorted, they'd both be the same color.
 

Attachments

  • Fig2.gif
    Fig2.gif
    5.7 KB · Views: 516
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #11
utnip123 said:
Oh starting from the Current source, I see 2 different paths.
I see 3 separate paths, 3 different paths that current can get from a to b. That says there are 3 parallel paths.
 
  • #12
NascentOxygen said:
I see 3 separate paths, 3 different paths that current can get from a to b. That says there are 3 parallel paths.

The 'paths' being referred to were for the contiguous wires representing the distinct nodes. So these 'paths' stop when ever they encounter a component.

You're perfectly correct though that there are 3 paths that current can follow, passing through components on the way from a to b.
 
  • #13
gneill said:
Yes, they're all connected in the same way. No, they are not short circuited. To be short circuited would imply a wire connection between a and b. But that's not possible if you identified them as distinct nodes:

attachment.php?attachmentid=66451&stc=1&d=1391978765.gif


If a and b were shorted, they'd both be the same color.

(Vb - Va)/40 + (Va - Vb)/20 + (Vb - Va)/40 = 0

Va = (.003)(40) = .12 V

Did i set this up right?
 
  • #14
utnip123 said:
(Vb - Va)/40 + (Va - Vb)/20 + (Vb - Va)/40 = 0

Va = (.003)(40) = .12 V

Did i set this up right?

No, your current directions seem to be a bit confused. Which node (of the two that were identified) are you taking to be your reference node for potentials? Also, you haven't accounted for the current source.

Did you figure out the simpler way to look at the circuit via the re-drawing of it? I don't suppose you could post your sketch?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K