Series solutions near a regular singular point

phrankle
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
For solving a series solution near a regular singular point with the Frobenius method, why is it that the indices of summation derivatives aren't shifted?

For example, in my textbook and lecture notes

y = \sumA_{}nx^{}n+r from n=0 to infinity

y' = \sum(n+r)A_{}nx^{}n+r-1 from n=0 to infinity

y'' = \sum(n+r)(n+r-1)A_{}nx^{}n+r-2 from n=0 to infinity


But shouldn't the index for y' be from n=1 to infinity because it shifts up when you take the derivative of a summation? Shouldn't the index for y'' be from n=2 to infinity?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi phrankle! Welcome to PF! :smile:

No, because then your An wouldn't match your x^(n+r-1), would it?

Of course, you could change it to ∑A(n+1)x^(n+r), and do it from n = -1 to ∞ …

but that would be unnecessarily complicated, and you could easily make a mistake … :frown:
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top