Servo duty cycle and overdriving

  • Thread starter Thread starter theycallmevirgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle Servo
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the service life and operational limits of small hobby servomotors, particularly focusing on current ratings, duty cycles, and the effects of exceeding torque limits. Participants explore both theoretical and practical aspects of motor operation, including demagnetization and temperature effects.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the expected service life of hobby servomotors and the implications of exceeding current ratings on power and duty cycle.
  • Another participant shares insights from industrial servomotor experience, explaining the concepts of RMS and peak torque, and the risks associated with exceeding these limits.
  • A question is raised regarding whether exceeding peak torque leads to demagnetization due to the Curie temperature.
  • A response clarifies that demagnetization occurs not due to temperature but rather due to the rapid magnetization process and the time it takes to build and collapse the magnetic field.
  • Further discussion includes confusion about the demagnetization process and whether it involves merely flipping the magnetic field rather than complete demagnetization.
  • One participant references the Arrhenius Law in relation to temperature effects on component lifespan, suggesting caution when operating near RMS limits due to potential overheating.
  • Another participant agrees that flipping the magnetic field incorrectly can lead to effective demagnetization, especially with moving rotors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of demagnetization and the implications of exceeding torque limits. There is no consensus on the specifics of how these processes work or their effects on motor operation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific technical concepts such as RMS and peak torque, but the discussion lacks detailed calculations or empirical data to support claims. The effects of temperature on motor lifespan and performance are also mentioned but not fully resolved.

theycallmevirgo
Messages
108
Reaction score
25
TL;DR
How can I evaluate duty cycle of small servomotors?
What kind of service life can I expect from small hobby servomotors? Can I exceed current rating for increased power? How will that affect duty cycle?

Thanks so much in advance

Joe
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
My experience is with industrial permanent magnet servomotors, not hobby motors, so take this accordingly. Industrial servomotors have two torque limits - RMS (average) torque and peak torque. The RMS torque is the allowable torque for continuous operation. The peak torque is the maximum allowable torque for a short time.

Operating at torques greater than RMS torque requires calculating the motor temperature rise over a worst case operation cycle. Shaft load calculations are also required.

Operating at greater than peak torque will instantly demagnetize the permanent magnets. Then the motor is junk, and cannot be repaired.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, theycallmevirgo and berkeman
jrmichler said:
My experience is with industrial permanent magnet servomotors, not hobby motors, so take this accordingly. Industrial servomotors have two torque limits - RMS (average) torque and peak torque. The RMS torque is the allowable torque for continuous operation. The peak torque is the maximum allowable torque for a short time.

Operating at torques greater than RMS torque requires calculating the motor temperature rise over a worst case operation cycle. Shaft load calculations are also required.

Operating at greater than peak torque will instantly demagnetize the permanent magnets. Then the motor is junk, and cannot be repaired.
Thanks so much, very helpful
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jrmichler said:
Operating at greater than peak torque will instantly demagnetize the permanent magnets.

Is this because of exceeding the Curie temperature?
 
No. Permanent magnets are manufactured as a non-magnetized block. That block is placed in an electromagnet, which is then energized. The magnetization process is instantaneous, plus the time to build and collapse the magnetic field. One microsecond is more than enough time to magnetize or demagnetize a permanent magnet, so temperature is not involved.

Temperature can also demagnetize a permanent magnet. This is a good discussion of temperature effects on neodymium magnets: https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=temperature-and-neodymium-magnets.

As a child, I learned how to fix a compass that pointed south. My father wrapped some wire around the compass, and flashed that wire across the car battery. After that, it pointed north.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
jrmichler said:
As a child, I learned how to fix a compass that pointed south. My father wrapped some wire around the compass, and flashed that wire across the car battery. After that, it pointed north.
But demagnetizing (degaussing) an object with remanence (hysteresis) is not so easy. Hence the typical AC degaussing field tapering to shrink the hysteresis loop to zero. So I am confused by how this works. Are you not demagnitizing but just "flipping" the field?
And some of the very newest rare earth megnets have very low Curie Temps....I was shocked.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and dlgoff
hutchphd said:
(degaussing)
Brings back memories of degaussing TV picture tubes and computer monitors.
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degaussing
Degauss-in-progress_at_Dell-Trinitron-monitor.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and berkeman
I use Arrhenius Law to inter/extrapolate for a 40'C riseto a 80'C rise. This is how all e-caps are rated for accelerated failure rates. I would avoid the limits of RMS power because there is no cooling mechanism for these products and give margin to the max RMS power being applied. Typically we know life span reduces 50% for every 10'C rise above ambient until some catastrophic melting point or oxidation occurs that causes contamination or whatever.
 
hutchphd said:
Are you not demagnitizing but just "flipping" the field?
Yes, I think this is correct. But you are flipping the field in the wrong pattern for good motor operation, particularly if the rotor is moving. Taken as a whole, the magnets may be effectively de-magnetized.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
8K
Replies
55
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
24K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K