Settle a bet on time and distance.

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hazzatori
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a hypothetical scenario involving two synchronized clocks, one on a platform and another one light-year away. Participants explore the implications of light travel time on the perception of time displayed on the clocks, considering the effects of distance and synchronization in the context of relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that it would take one year to see the far clock, as they believe time starts when stepping on the platform and stops when stepping off.
  • Another participant argues that the far clock can be seen immediately due to light that was emitted one year prior, meaning the time displayed would be from a year ago.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of clock synchronization, where one participant clarifies that synchronization does not mean both clocks show the same time when viewed, but rather that they would show the same time once light travel time is accounted for.
  • One participant introduces ambiguity regarding the interpretation of when time starts for the clocks, suggesting different outcomes based on how the scenario is interpreted.
  • Another participant mentions that if the far clock has a "go" light that activates when it starts ticking, the observer could see both clocks ticking in sync depending on the timing of their actions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the timing of when the far clock can be seen and how synchronization is perceived. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the scenario, leading to multiple competing views regarding the effects of light travel time and clock synchronization.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of time starting and stopping, the interpretation of synchronization, and the effects of light travel time, which remain unresolved and depend on specific interpretations of the scenario.

hazzatori
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hear is my first post and go easy Hawkins i aint! but its to settle a little bet at work.

Lets say i am stood in a Universe that obeys all of the laws of physics as our own, no differences at all,

but all that is in this Universe is

1 Platform with a 12 hour clock face on it

and

1 Giant 12 hour clock face

both are synced to same time.

(oh and and some light so we can see, O2 so we can breath etc)

when i stand on the platform for the first time time starts, when i step off time stops

The distance from the platform to the clock face is exactly 1 Light Year, but the clock is so large all i can see in my peripheral vision is the clock face.

Am i right in believing that firstly, it would take me one year from stepping on the platform to even see the clock face?

then as i do see it and as it is precisely 1 light year away, i would see the time on both clock faces as exactly the same time in fact they should even tick over precisely.

then if the platform moves closer to the large clockface the times would not stay synced or would they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This probably belongs in the Special Relativity forum.

So you have two clocks. They are one light-year apart. The far clock is big enough to be seen from that distance. The two clocks are synchronized.

By convention, we take this to mean that the clocks are synchronized in the frame of reference within which they are both at rest. Also, by convention, the synchronization is such that the measured speed of light, timed with the use of the two clocks is judged to be the same going from near clock to far as from far clock to near.

You step on the platform with the near clock. No, it does not take you a year to see the far clock. You see it immediately. It had been illuminated a year ago and light reflected from past illumination is continuously arriving at the near platform. The light is all ready for someone to step up and start seeing it.

You would see the time displayed by the far clock showing a date and time as of one year ago. That's when the light from that year-ago reading left from the far clock's face.

The fact that the clocks are synchronized does not mean that you _see_ both displays showing the same time. It means that _once you account for speed of light delays_, both displays would show the same time. That's part of the standard convention for synchronization.

If the one clock is moved _slowly_ to the other you would find that the two clocks show the same time when they meet and that it does not matter which is moved to the other.

If one clock is moved _rapidly_ to the other you would find that the clock that was moved shows a time that is one year stale as compared to the clock that was not moved.

"slowly" is in the limit as the clock transport speed decreases toward zero.
"rapidly" is in the limit as the clock transport speed increases toward light speed.

In between the high speed and low speed limits you would find that the clock that moved is stale, but not a whole year stale.
 
What does this mean:

1 Platform with a 12 hour clock face on it...

The distance from the platform to the clock face is exactly 1 Light Year...
 
hazzatori said:
when i stand on the platform for the first time time starts, when i step off time stops

This is a little ambiguous, and the different ways it should be interpreted affect the answer.

It could be interpreted to mean that each clock starts when it's detector sees you step onto the platform. In this case you will see the distant clock 2 years behind. It takes 1 year for the signal that you stepped onto the platform to reach the clock, and another year for the light from the clock to reach you after it starts ticking.

Now suppose there is a big "go" light on the far clock. The clock starts ticking at the same time the "go" light turns on. You step onto the plate when you see the go light turn on. In this case you see both clocks tick in sync.

Now you did leave the option to interpret the whole thing as a trick question. You stated the distance to be exactly 1 light year and you specified a 12 hour clock face. Based on a year that is exactly 365 days long you would see the clocks tick in sync regardless. It would depend on the specific interpretation weather you see the far clock start ticking at the same time, 730 hour hand revolutions later, or 1460 hour hand revolutions later. In any case, once you see them both start ticking they should read the same time and tic in sync.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K