Shear Diagram - Beam with 3 supports

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on drawing the shear diagram for a compound supported beam with three supports. The user encountered difficulties in solving for reactions at supports A, B, and C using static equilibrium equations, leading to a cancellation of variables. Key equations include the sum of vertical forces and moments about points A and B. The consensus is that the upward force at pin C is not zero, and separate equilibrium equations for segments A-B-C and C-D should be utilized to resolve the problem effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles in mechanics
  • Familiarity with shear and bending moment diagrams
  • Knowledge of how to apply the equations of equilibrium to beams
  • Basic proficiency in solving algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to construct shear and moment diagrams for beams with multiple supports
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in greater depth, focusing on beams
  • Explore the effects of different support types on beam reactions
  • Practice solving problems involving compound beams and multiple loading conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering or physics, particularly those studying statics, as well as educators and professionals involved in structural analysis and design.

teeth
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Draw the shear diagram for the compound supported beam.
7uMqg.png


Homework Equations



Statics... so sum of moments at any point or forces in any direction are 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I summed the forces in the y direction, as well as the moments at A and moments at B, but using these 3 equations causes the variables to cancel out when solving for the reactions. I get 0 = 0...
I guess I cannot use two moment equations, but then how am I to solve this? I'm in first year statics.

My equations are...
0 = \sum F_y = A_y + B_y + D_y -3*6 - 5
0 = \sum M_A = B_y*3 + D_y*9 -3*6*3 - 5*7.5
0 = \sum M_B = -A_y*3 + D_y*6 - 5*4.5
Counter-clockwise moment is positive
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a pinned joint at point C. Try splitting the single beam into two parts: A-B-C and C-D. Write separate equations of static equilibrium for each piece of the beam. What's the bending moment at point C?
 
Sorry, is the bending moment at C zero?
I tried getting isolating for C_y but I keep getting C_y = 0
Is the upward force at pin C the same as the "shear force" at C?
 
teeth said:
Sorry, is the bending moment at C zero?

Yes. The pin cannot develop a moment.

I tried getting isolating for C_y but I keep getting C_y = 0
Is the upward force at pin C the same as the "shear force" at C?

If you write equilibrium equations for beam C-D, you'll see that Cy cannot be zero.
 
teeth said:

Homework Statement


Draw the shear diagram for the compound supported beam.
7uMqg.png


Homework Equations



Statics... so sum of moments at any point or forces in any direction are 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I summed the forces in the y direction, as well as the moments at A and moments at B, but using these 3 equations causes the variables to cancel out when solving for the reactions. I get 0 = 0...
I guess I cannot use two moment equations, but then how am I to solve this? I'm in first year statics.

My equations are...
0 = \sum F_y = A_y + B_y + D_y -3*6 - 5
0 = \sum M_A = B_y*3 + D_y*9 -3*6*3 - 5*7.5
0 = \sum M_B = -A_y*3 + D_y*6 - 5*4.5
Counter-clockwise moment is positive

Hi Teeth, I had a query.

By taking the moments about Point A and B, You have formulated the equations 2 and 3.
Is this way of generating equations right ?

Looking forward to a reply from you soon.

Aman Ratan
Thanks
 
Aman Ratan said:
Hi Teeth, I had a query.

By taking the moments about Point A and B, You have formulated the equations 2 and 3.
Is this way of generating equations right ?

Looking forward to a reply from you soon.

Aman Ratan
Thanks
Teeth hasn't been around PF since posting this question a year and a half ago, so I hope you are not looking for a reply any time soon.

PF generally frowns on resurrecting old posts like this.

It is OK to link to an old post if you have a particular question about it, but you should start your own thread in that case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aman Ratan
SteamKing said:
Teeth hasn't been around PF since posting this question a year and a half ago, so I hope you are not looking for a reply any time soon.

PF generally frowns on resurrecting old posts like this.

It is OK to link to an old post if you have a particular question about it, but you should start your own thread in that case.

Thanks SteamKing
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K