Shear Interferometer to test collimation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on testing the collimation of light from an off-axis parabolic mirror using a shear interferometer. The user is experiencing issues with sensitivity, as moving the point source by several millimeters does not significantly change the interference pattern. The pinhole diameter of 100 microns is deemed too large, and a smaller diameter of 5 to 10 microns is recommended for better spatial coherence. Additionally, the flatness of the shear plate may impact results, and ensuring proper filling of the mirror is crucial. Adjusting these parameters could enhance the effectiveness of the collimation test.
Woland
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I am trying to test the collimation of light emerging from an off-axis parabolic mirror. My mirror has a diameter of 0.5m or so. The focal length is about 5m. The light source I am using is a red laser focused at a pinhole. To test the collimation of this point source, I am using a shear plate. Basically light comes in, reflects from both sides of the thick piece of glass, and produces an interference pattern. The laser is good enough to produce fringe patterns. The angle of the fringe patterns indicates the radius of curvature of the wavefront, and therefore the collimation.

What I am finding is that this method is not sensitive enough for me, because I can move the point source by several mm before I notice a change in the pattern angle. Also, my patterns go wavy once in a while, so that doesn't help.

Is anyone familiar with this technique, and can give some advice on how to improve this set up. Maybe a different approach all together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the diameter of the pinhole? What is the flatness of your shear plate? When you say you move the point source several mm, is that along the optical axis, transverse, etc.? How well are you filling the mirror?
 
The pinhole diameter is 100um. I am not sure about the flatness of the plate, but here is a link to the model I am using:
http://www.thorlabs.com/thorProduct.cfm?partNumber=SI750

When I mention moving the point, I mean along the optical axis. I start with a position which provides a diverging beam, move the source through the focal point, and, in theory, stop once it is at the focal point of the mirror.

The mirror is filled fully by the point source, in fact the point source overfills the mirror.
 
The pinhole diameter is too big. It should be closer to 5 or 10 microns (using the proper spatial filtering optics) in order to produce a good spatially coherent beam.

Try that and see what happens.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
961
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top