Shear Interferometer to test collimation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around testing the collimation of light from an off-axis parabolic mirror using a shear interferometer. Participants explore the effectiveness of the current setup, including the light source and the shear plate, and seek advice on improving sensitivity and accuracy in measuring collimation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes using a shear plate to create interference patterns to assess the collimation of light from a red laser focused at a pinhole.
  • Concerns are raised about the sensitivity of the method, noting that significant movement of the point source does not yield noticeable changes in the pattern angle.
  • Another participant questions the diameter of the pinhole and the flatness of the shear plate, suggesting that these factors may influence the results.
  • A later reply suggests that the pinhole diameter is too large and recommends reducing it to 5 or 10 microns to improve spatial coherence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the current setup, particularly regarding the pinhole size and its impact on collimation testing. There is no consensus on the best approach to improve the sensitivity of the measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not established the flatness of the shear plate, which may affect the results. Additionally, the discussion does not resolve the implications of moving the point source along the optical axis on the interference patterns.

Woland
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I am trying to test the collimation of light emerging from an off-axis parabolic mirror. My mirror has a diameter of 0.5m or so. The focal length is about 5m. The light source I am using is a red laser focused at a pinhole. To test the collimation of this point source, I am using a shear plate. Basically light comes in, reflects from both sides of the thick piece of glass, and produces an interference pattern. The laser is good enough to produce fringe patterns. The angle of the fringe patterns indicates the radius of curvature of the wavefront, and therefore the collimation.

What I am finding is that this method is not sensitive enough for me, because I can move the point source by several mm before I notice a change in the pattern angle. Also, my patterns go wavy once in a while, so that doesn't help.

Is anyone familiar with this technique, and can give some advice on how to improve this set up. Maybe a different approach all together?
 
Science news on Phys.org
What is the diameter of the pinhole? What is the flatness of your shear plate? When you say you move the point source several mm, is that along the optical axis, transverse, etc.? How well are you filling the mirror?
 
The pinhole diameter is 100um. I am not sure about the flatness of the plate, but here is a link to the model I am using:
http://www.thorlabs.com/thorProduct.cfm?partNumber=SI750

When I mention moving the point, I mean along the optical axis. I start with a position which provides a diverging beam, move the source through the focal point, and, in theory, stop once it is at the focal point of the mirror.

The mirror is filled fully by the point source, in fact the point source overfills the mirror.
 
The pinhole diameter is too big. It should be closer to 5 or 10 microns (using the proper spatial filtering optics) in order to produce a good spatially coherent beam.

Try that and see what happens.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K