I Short Distance Quantum Physics

clarkvangilder
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Does this paper [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.06963.pdf] give sufficient reason to accept/believe that the infinities where we "find" singularities can never really happen because there is a minimum length scale that prevents it? Hoping that I have made at least a reasonable deduction from the article.

I also sense that they may misuse the notion of quantum fluctuations (based on other threads herein); but reserve the right to be wrong on that too.

Just interested in getting some opinions on this rather than starting a fight. Sometimes just asking a question in here leads to a scolding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, what the heck are the prefixes for? I had not seen that before. Hope choosing B was OK.
 
clarkvangilder said:
what the heck are the prefixes for?

For identifying the level of background knowledge assumed in the discussion. "B" is basic (high school), "I" is intermediate (undergraduate), "A" is advanced (graduate). I have changed the level of this thread to "I" (the subject matter could even be "A").
 
  • Like
Likes clarkvangilder
As I understand it, any introduction of singularities poses problems for QM just as much as GR.
Possibly a strong theory for Quantum Gravity might one day address these problems.
 
  • Like
Likes clarkvangilder
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
8K
Replies
286
Views
23K
Back
Top