Short Proof regarding elements of a vector space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that if two elements v and w of a vector space V satisfy the equation v + w = O (the zero vector), then it follows that w = -v. The initial proof presented is valid and correctly applies properties of vector spaces, including the definition of the additive inverse and the properties of equality. The solution manual confirms this conclusion, emphasizing the importance of using established properties such as associativity and commutativity in vector space operations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector space properties, including additive inverses.
  • Familiarity with basic operations in vector spaces, such as addition and equality.
  • Knowledge of the definitions of zero vectors and additive identities.
  • Ability to apply properties like associativity and commutativity in mathematical proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces in detail, focusing on additive inverses and identities.
  • Learn how to construct formal proofs in linear algebra, emphasizing the use of established properties.
  • Explore the implications of the commutativity and associativity properties in vector space operations.
  • Review examples of proofs involving vector spaces to reinforce understanding of proof techniques.
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational properties of vector spaces and their applications in proofs.

srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Let V be a vector space and v, w two elements of V. If v+w=O, show that w=-v

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is my attempt:

1. v+w=O
2. v+(-v)=O
3. v+w=v+(-v). Subtracting v from both sides yields:
4. w=-v



The solution manual has this as the correct answer:

-w=-w+O=-w+(v+w)=v+w-w=v



Is my attempt correct as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your proof is perfectly valid.
 
What properties of vector spaces are you permitted to use? I'm mostly concerned with going from step 3 to step 4. If you are permitted to add to both sides of an equality, presumably you could have done that from the start:

v+w=0 (Given)
-v+(v+w)=-v+0 (Left addition on both sides of an equality: this is the property I'm worried about you using)
(-v+v)+w=-v+0 (Associativity of +: the book solution uses it)
0+w=-v+0 (Definition of -v)
w=-v (Definition of 0)

Speaking of subtraction, you need to be careful with that as well. It's possible you haven't yet defined what v-w means. It's probably more appropriate to say "adding the additive inverse", like you wrote in step 2.

You need to be really careful when proving "obvious" statements that you only use the properties that are assumed or that you've already proved. It helps to identify the exact property that you're using every step of the way.

Note that you also use transitivity of = (in 1 & 2 to 3), but so does your book. The book also also uses commutativity of +.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K