Shortest Ladder Length to Reach 2 Meters on a Quarter-Circle Ground?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sink41
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the shortest length of a ladder that can reach a height of 2 meters while positioned on a quarter-circle ground with a radius of 1 meter, plus an additional height of 1 meter. The problem involves concepts from physics, particularly statics, forces, and torque, alongside mathematical modeling of the situation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the ladder's length, angles, and forces acting on it, including friction and normal forces. There are attempts to derive equations based on torque and forces in both horizontal and vertical directions. Some participants express confusion regarding the setup and the complexity of the equations involved.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the equations needed to analyze the problem, including torque calculations and force balances. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of the equations, with some participants questioning the assumptions made regarding forces and their interactions. A participant claims to have arrived at a numerical answer, though the discussion remains open to further clarification and exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for multiple interpretations of the forces acting on the ladder, particularly concerning the normal force and friction. There is also mention of the need to consider the ladder's position on the slope and how it affects the forces involved.

Sink41
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Basically wondering what shortest possible length of this ladder is, one that reaches 2 meters high. The ground its on is quarter of a circle with radius 1 with an extra length of 1 on top. Weight is 40 (so 40*gravity for force) and µ (coefficient of friction) between ground and ladder is 0.8

http://img283.imageshack.us/img283/7131/ladderquestion2tz8.th.png

I sort of worked out an answer, but its two complex for me to work out so i thought i'd post here

i started off by modeling the curve bit as y = -(1 - (x^2))^0.5 ; 0<x<1w = 1 - x

h = 1 - y (y is negative)The length can therefore be written as

L = (h^2 + w^2)^0.5

L = ((1-y)^2 + (1-x)^2)^0.5Next i worked out angles:

tan(theta1) = dy/dx

dy/dx = x/(1 - (x^2))^0.5

tan(theta1) = x/(1 - (x^2))^0.5
tan(theta2) = (1 - y)/(1 - x)

Forces must be the same in all directions:

S + Rsin(theta1) = Fcos(theta1) (x axis)

40g = Rcos(theta1) + Fsin(theta1) (y axis)

g = 9.8 (gravity)Magnitude of rotation around base of ladder must be zero:

(1/2)(40g)(L)cos(theta2) = (L)(S)sin(theta2)Friction = µR

F = 0.8RCancelling down i got two equations with L and x... unfortunately one is so complicated that i have no idea how to put them together. I'm also worried that i made a mistake somewhere, since it got so complicated, is there possibly an easier/less complicated way of working it out than i did?

First equation, pretty easy to see where i got this (replaced y with x):

L = ((1 + (1 - (x^2))^0.5)^2 + (1 - x)^2)^0.5

Second equation (possibly incorrect):

0 = ((196(1-x))/(1+(1-(x^2))^0.5))/(0.8-(x/(1-(x^2))^0.5)) - ((392)/(1+((0.8x)/((1-x)^2))))

or written in paint:

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/8880/equationcy1.th.png

Which i canceled down to (possibly even more incorrect)

0.8x^2 + 2.8x -1.6 + x(1 - x^2)^0.5 - 0.6(1 - x^2)^0.5 = 0

So i have no idea how to put those together, or work out when x is zero. Putting them into a graphing program i got:

http://img474.imageshack.us/img474/117/crazygraphhg7.th.png

(blue is first red is second)

this means there would be two possible places at which the ladder would be at limiting equilibrium... unsure whether this should happen.So can anyone help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you calculate torque about the base of the ladder, and the net force in the horizontal axis, you should get two equations, which, with the information you already have, can be used to answer this question.
 
NateTG said:
If you calculate torque about the base of the ladder, and the net force in the horizontal axis, you should get two equations, which, with the information you already have, can be used to answer this question.

I already have both of those?

torque:

(1/2)(40g)(L)cos(theta2) = (L)(S)sin(theta2)horizontal:

S + Rsin(theta1) = Fcos(theta1) (x axis)I just tried cancelling everything down again and got the two equations again:

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/8880/equationcy1.th.png

andL = ((1 + (1 - (x^2))^0.5)^2 + (1 - x)^2)^0.5I don't know how to put them together... or how to solve the first one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The maximum force of friction on the bottom of the ladder is:
[tex]40 \mu g[/tex]

The only other horizontal fore acting on the ladder is the normal force on the wall. So, if I read your notation you should have:
[tex]F_h=40 \mu g+S=0[/tex]
so
[tex]S=40 \mu g[/tex]
 
NateTG said:
The maximum force of friction on the bottom of the ladder is:
[tex]40 \mu g[/tex]

The only other horizontal fore acting on the ladder is the normal force on the wall. So, if I read your notation you should have:
[tex]F_h=40 \mu g+S=0[/tex]
so
[tex]S=40 \mu g[/tex]

Doesnt the normal force come out at a 90degre angle to whatever an object is resting on? Then R would change as you moved the ladder up the slope. I am confused whether you ment maximum force of friction as in when the ladder is at the bottom of the slope or whether you are saying that R is always 40g.
 
...
The normal force exerted by the floor on the ladder, and gravity are the only two forces acting on the lader in the vertical direction. Since this is a statics problem, they must cancel - so they're of equal magnitude in opposite directions.
 
NateTG said:
...
The normal force exerted by the floor on the ladder, and gravity are the only two forces acting on the lader in the vertical direction. Since this is a statics problem, they must cancel - so they're of equal magnitude in opposite directions.

Ok, got an answer of 1.81 thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K