Should a neutrino be moving slightly slower than c?

  • Thread starter Thread starter San K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino
San K
Messages
905
Reaction score
1
The ICARUS results evidence that neutrino moves at speed, not faster/slower, but same as c.
The CERN results seem to be wrong due to some error in the equipment.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1203/1203.3433.pdf

aren't the neutrinos expected to travel slightly slower than c? (due to slight mass)

or is the mass (velocity) difference too small to be noticeable, by any experiment?

c = speed of light/photon

the photon has zero rest mass. i am assuming that the relativistic mass of the photon is less than that of neutrino.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The MSW effect says that neutrinos have (some) mass...except there's the loop hole that 1 mass eigenstate of the neutrinos could be 0, so there's that. There are some upper bounds on neutrino masses, but they seem to be extremely extremely light.

Neutrinos from SN1987A showed that they basically kept their 3 hour head start on the photons over a distance of ~160k light years! This means they travel EXTREMELY close to the speed of light.

EDIT: I typo'd I should have said 1 mass eigenstate "COULD BE" 0. The MSW effect doesn't say that any of them has to be 0. It does say that not all of them can be 0, however.
 
You're right, they should. But as you say the difference may be incredibly small, especially if you consider that neutrinos from the 1987 supernova arrived at about the same time as light did (apart from the three hour difference which was due to other factors). So my guess is that the slight lag in speed for the neutrinos may be too small to measure with our current technology.

(BTW, shouldn't this question go into the other neutrino thread?)
 
lmoh said:
(BTW, shouldn't this question go into the other neutrino thread?)

Where it's already been answered in posts 750 and 751...
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top