- #141
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2023 Award
- 33,241
- 19,728
Dr. Courtney said:Hillsdale
Is Hillsdale religious? It's certainly conservative,
Dr. Courtney said:Hillsdale
Vanadium 50 said:Is Hillsdale religious? It's certainly conservative,
John Allen Paulos brings this up in his book "Innumeracy," that at dinner parties, many who were considered "intellectuals" had little or no knowledge of mathematics or the sciences more current than about the 17th century. On the other hand, as anecdotal evidence, many of the people who were my instructors in mathematics or the sciences (principally physics) or were my peers when I was teaching were quite knowledgeable in literature and the arts. My hiking buddy, who was a fellow math instructor at a community college, is a frequent chorus member in the Seattle Opera and other local opera companies.vela said:One of my former colleagues would always bring this point up in discussions about STEM education. She would note how people are considered educated if they know about literature, history, art, and so on even if they are woefully ignorant of science and math. But if you turn that around, a scientist or mathematician who's not well versed in the humanities isn't considered educated so much; rather, he or she is just a nerd.
So computer languages and foreign languages are valuable for me even outside of their expected uses, because they trained my mind to think and solve problems in ways I might not otherwise.
russ_watters said:I'm trying to decide if this should bother me or please me.
symbolipoint said:This is great, from Dr. Courtney:
Dr. Courtney said:Hillsdale goes on and on about the US Constitution.
bhobba said:Even out here in Aus that's what I have gleaned about that school rather than being really religious. Everyone thinks Thomas Aquinas college is really religious as well but its more about Socratic discussion of great books than actual religion.
That goes along the meaning of Liberal Arts. Students are to study and learn about a large variety of subjects.Dr. Courtney said:Circling back to the original discussion, I will note that even a liberal arts school like Hillsdale College requires one semester each of Math, Chemistry, Physics, and Biology of all their majors, even the humanities. Their view of education has these course requirements even for majors in: French, German, Politics, Art, Greek, Psychology, History, Religion, Latin, Marketing, Music, Theater, Physical Education, and Philosophy.
This topic was, although containing slightly outrageous comments, NOT a waste of time. This was a good topic and well-discussed.PhotonSSBM said:I've been thinking a lot over the last few weeks about this without posting. The main reason I posted was to be challenged, and maybe garner some ideas from all of you.
I...
Sorry to waste everyone's' time.
Dr. Courtney said:Circling back to the original discussion, I will note that even a liberal arts school like Hillsdale College requires one semester each of Math, Chemistry, Physics, and Biology of all their majors, even the humanities. Their view of education has these course requirements even for majors in: French, German, Politics, Art, Greek, Psychology, History, Religion, Latin, Marketing, Music, Theater, Physical Education, and Philosophy.
Maylis said:. I had to take a a lot of non-STEM courses that did no good for me.
Vanadium 50 said:I believe that. However, shouldn't they at least try?
Specifically, you have been unable to persuade us that tinting laws shouldn't apply to you, unable to persuade us that you deserve substantially more money while providing substantially less value to your company than your salary, and unable to persuade us that an 8 hour workday is too long. Given this, shouldn't you be advocating for more and better classes involving persuasive writing?
I am unswayed by your argument here - if you found no value in some of your classes, why should the other classes - presumably the ones you did find valuable - no longer be required? I'll take the "pittance salary" that I was unable to persuade you on. Or do you mind writing me a check?
Is this just anecdotal, or can you cite specific laws in your state that make an exception for government vehicles with regard to the tinting?Maylis said:Yeah my thread was locked before I even had a chance to respond. Tint laws don't apply to government official vehicles though.
I can empathize with you to some extent here. Before transferring to a four-year school, I needed to take a few classes in "general education" which for me included Art History, Music Appreciation, Anthropology, and Philosophy. Many (most?) four-year schools have an interest in producing well-rounded graduates rather than ones who have passed through a narrowly focussed curriculum. I don't begrudge having to take those classes very much, but I agree that students in the humanities (including art) ought to have at least some knowledge of mathematics and the sciences, if only to be as well-rounded as the STEM students are.Maylis said:Just us common folk. I guess if you are in a marked car its easier to drive at night??
I would advocate for technical writing classes offered in the english (or mixed with science/engineering) department at the CC level. Also, I'm not even trying to make an argument. I'm just pointing out that humanities majors do not have to take math, but STEM majors have to take humanities? I think I took at least 6 humanities/art classes in total, whereas they don't even have to take one math class? I am perfectly okay with neither of us taking courses that are not related. I don't even think this is controversial in many countries, even in Europe.
Maylis said:By the way, there is a real world impact of making me take all those unnecessary courses. It's very difficult to go through CC in 2 years, which pushes us back a year, which means we get our job a year later, which means opportunity COST. All so they can "try" to make art history more useful to me? I would rather have my "pittance" annual salary that I was unable to persuade you on. Or are you willing to write me a check?
Doesn't matter whether or not it's in the books. I'm not going to go dig through the code to try and find where the rules are, probably hidden since it pertains to government vehicles. I care about actual enforcement (j-walking is on the books too I'm sure). That's why I didn't care before since police where I am generally don't enforce that particular law. The percentage never changed, only that it is now part of the annual safety inspection. Here's a photo of my state's governor (can you guess who this is?) getting into a vehicle. That front window I am certain is 5% VLT.Mark44 said:Is this just anecdotal, or can you cite specific laws in your state that make an exception for government vehicles with regard to the tinting?
Mark44 said:Is this just anecdotal, or can you cite specific laws in your state that make an exception for government vehicles with regard to the tinting?
From the rules for this forum:Maylis said:Doesn't matter whether or not it's in the books. I'm not going to go dig through the code to try and find where the rules are, probably hidden since it pertains to government vehicles.
Generally, discussion topics should be traceable to standard textbooks or to peer-reviewed scientific literature.
I don't see how that can be true. You can see the A pillar inside the car pretty clearly. At only 5% VLT I don't think you would be able to.Maylis said:I care about actual enforcement (j-walking is on the books too I'm sure). Here's a photo of my state's governor (can you guess who this is?) getting into a vehicle. That front window I am certain is 5% VLT.
Bother you, it should definitely bother you. It entails that the general public benefit greatly from the development of science but instantly tag scientists as nerds or "smart social outcasts." Terrible just terrible IMOruss_watters said:I'm trying to decide if this should bother me or please me.
After a 360° the car would be going in the same direction.thejosh said:A car smashes into a wall. Two witnesses are asked to give an account of what happened.One stated that the driver must've seen the police at the bottom of the road and, trying to avoid them, attempted a u turn and somehow lost control. The other witness stated that the cars inertia was too great for it to turn a full 360 degrees
I don't interpret your examples as literature vs. math. Your first example attempts to explain the motivation of the driver. The second example describes the behavior of the car.thejosh said:without its center of mass causing it to create a moments which would overturn it so the driver tried to counter this and, due to conservation of momentum, smashed into the wall attempting to stop. Both of them are correct but their accounts don't make sense until put together.That's maths and literature- two seemingly different subjects that actually compliment each other.
thejosh said:That, in my opinion, is why a litterateur sometimes goes too far to the "imaginative side" and a mathematician will often lack imagination- they're not complete unless together.
Sorry I meant to say 180 degrees - don't worry school's starting soon.Mark44 said:After a 360° the car would be going in the same direction.
The mathematician calculated the reason the car overturned rather than the reason behind the driver;'s actions whilst the litterateur did the opposite- he deduced the motivation behind the driver's actions rather than the reason the car smashed into the wall.Mark44 said:I don't interpret your examples as literature vs. math. Your first example attempts to explain the motivation of the driver. The second example describes the behavior of the car.
As I said before, your examples provide explanations from two different perspectives. Someone versed in basic physics could provide both perspectives: an explanation of the car's motion and a reasoned guess at the driver's motivation.thejosh said:Sorry I meant to say 180 degrees - don't worry school's starting soon.
The mathematician calculated the reason the car overturned rather than the reason behind the driver;'s actions whilst the litterateur did the opposite- he deduced the motivation behind the driver's actions rather than the reason the car smashed into the wall.
I'm not sure that this is true. One necessary condition for effective analysis is the ability to reason logically.thejosh said:Reading literature enables effective analysis
...that was somewhat tongue-in-cheek. The real answer is I'm [mostly] delighted by it:thejosh said:Bother you, it should definitely bother you. It entails that the general public benefit greatly from the development of science but instantly tag scientists as nerds or "smart social outcasts." Terrible just terrible IMO
russ_watters said:Note, this doesn't alter my opinion on the core issue of the thread: schooling in a broad range of subjects should continue to be mandatory through high school, with specialization starting after, for people who intend to go to college.
He's trying. His example may be, maybe is not working. A different example, maybe better. But really, Literature is the Art of Writing and Story-Telling. Algebra has a different purpose, but still relies on great literacy (just as Literature...).Mark44 said:As I said before, your examples provide explanations from two different perspectives. Someone versed in basic physics could provide both perspectives: an explanation of the car's motion and a reasoned guess at the driver's motivation.