Schools Should I apply to more reach schools for graduate studies?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the strategic approach to applying for graduate programs, particularly in the context of differing advice from professors. One professor suggests a balanced application strategy, recommending a mix of top, mid-range, and safety schools. In contrast, the other professor advocates for applying to more top schools, arguing that given the applicant's strong GPA (just under 3.8) and impressive GRE scores (160 verbal, 169 math), luck could favor acceptance into competitive programs. The applicant is also engaged in biophysics research and aims to transition into condensed matter or quantum information science. The conversation highlights the importance of application strategy and the role of chance in graduate admissions, with a consensus that applying to multiple schools can be beneficial if financially feasible.
theDRG5
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a question pretty specific towards my situation but I think its an interesting thing to think about anyways.

I am in the process of applying for graduate programs for the fall, and from two professors I got slightly different advice. One said that I should apply to few top schools, few mid range, and few lower "safety" schools. Decent advice, right?

Now the other professor told me that considering my GPA and GRE score, I should apply to few mid range schools, and apply more to top schools because luck has a lot to do with being accepted to a program, and he thinks I will probably get into mid range schools (USC, Irvine, etc). To put things in perspective My GPA is just shy of 3.8, my GRE score is 160 and 169, verbal and math respectively, and I don't know my physics GRE score yet.

What do you think? Does luck play big enough role in graduate school admission to warrant applying to lots of top schools?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you can afford it, apply to as many schools as possible. . . also, what is your research work like? your grades / scores def seem high enough to be qualified for top schools.
 
I'm looking into applying to about 10 schools? I am doing research on biophysics, been on it for two semesters now. I want to be doing condensed matter or quantum information science though
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top