Should I Attempt the Pass? Kinematics Problem on a Car

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a kinematics problem involving a car attempting to pass a truck while considering the speed and distance of an oncoming vehicle. The car must cover a total distance of 40 meters to safely pass the truck, while both vehicles are traveling at 25 m/s. The equations for the displacements of both the car and the truck are set equal to determine the time it takes for the car to pass. However, solving these equations indicates that the car cannot pass within the given constraints, as it would require more time than available. The conversation also touches on formatting issues with LaTeX in the forum, emphasizing the need for clarity in mathematical representation.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A car is behind a truck going 25 m/s on the highway. The car's driver looks for an oportunity to pass, guessing that his car can accelerate at 1.0 m/s^2. He gauges that he has to cover the 20 m length of the truck, plus 10 m clear room at the rear of the truck and 10 m at the front of it. In an oncoming lane, he sees a car approaching, probably also traveling at 25 m/s. He estimates that the car is about 400 m away. Should he attempt the pass?

I know the displacement of the truck is x = 25 m/s*t

and that the displacement of the car is x = 25 m/s*t + 1/2(1.0 m/s^2)t^2.

I have this feeling that I am suppose to set this two equations equal to each other, and then solve for time, which will give me the time the car passes the truck. But I can't seem to figure out why this is true. What does it mean, physically, setting these two equations together?

Also, I try to preview my post, but it won't display latex, so I don't even know if I typed it in correctly. How do I get around this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I perhaps looking too deeply into this? I just feel that I need logical justification so that I may not just remember that it's suppose to be this way, but I can use reason.
 
"I have this feeling that I am suppose to set this two equations equal to each other, and then solve for time, which will give me the time the car passes the truck."

If you set the two equations equal to one another and solve for time, you get zero for the time. The car has to travel a greater distance than the truck in the same amount of time.

The problem states nothing about how much the passer should clear the oncoming car. How badly does the passer want to scare the approaching car's driver? When you scare other drivers, their reactions are unpredictable.
 
I can see the latex when i preview the post. Do you type in the latex urself or use the Latex refernce?
 
I type it in myself, because there were some symbols I couldn't find.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top