Should I Choose Medical or Particle Physics for Graduate School?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimateguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a recent undergraduate graduate evaluating options for pursuing an MSc in either medical physics or particle physics. The individual has experience in both fields but is uncertain about which path to take due to differing financial implications and career prospects. Medical physics may lead to significant debt due to limited funding from professors, yet it offers better job opportunities. Conversely, particle physics appears financially favorable but has a narrower job market, with reports of post-docs earning low wages. Suggestions include exploring more graduate school options, as some institutions accept students with a 3.0 GPA, and considering the feasibility of switching fields between an MSc and a PhD, which varies by region. Concerns about funding in medical physics are raised, with some participants expressing surprise at the lack of financial support, emphasizing that job prospects in medical physics are generally more favorable than in particle physics.
ultimateguy
Messages
122
Reaction score
1
I've just finished up my undergraduate degree and I have been looking at graduate schools for an MSc. Unfortunately, due to my B average, I'm down to basically one choice, which is the institution that I'm presently attending.

I've gotten experience in two fields in my undergraduate years:
-I spent two summers working in particle physics for EXO
-I did an undergraduate thesis in medical physics, specifically bone densitometry

As for choosing which field I prefer, I am very interested in both and can't really say that I prefer one over the other.

If I were to choose medical physics, I would be in piles of debt down the road because these professors don't have very much grant money. However, down the line I believe there would be many career opportunities.

If I were to choose particle physics, I would be much better off financially. However, I've heard that as far as careers go, particle physics is a much narrower field. I've heard stories of post-docs working in particle physics making the same wages as summer students.

So I'm stuck with having two different fields that I'm equally interested in, each with pros and cons.

One person suggested that I pursue an MSc. in particle physics, and then when it comes time for a PhD., I can pursue a different field. Is this even heard of?

Thanks in advance for any suggestions/advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should hunt around a little more for grad school options. There are definitely schools that would accept students with a 3.0 GPA for graduate work in physics. EDIT: although since you are graduating this year getting into another school will be harder... but it can be done.

I'm very surprised that the professors in medical physics don't have funding... There's generally a lot of money out there for medical physics and you certainly won't be unemployed with training in this area. Overall, the job prospects for someone with a medical physics background are probably better than for particle physics.

As for doing a particle M.Sc and then switching to something else - that depends a little on where you're from. If you're in the US there's not a very natural break between an MSc and a PhD, while in most other places there's a clearly defined break. It's definitely possible to change fields, but it would probably be better to decide on something before you start digging into your graduate work.

Do you have a professor/professors in mind who you would like to work for?
 
Last edited:
oedipa maas said:
I'm very surprised that the professors in medical physics don't have funding... There's generally a lot of money out there for medical physics and you certainly won't be unemployed with training in this area. Overall, the job prospects for someone with a medical physics background are probably better than for particle physics.

Strangely almost all of the professors I talked to when I was considering medical physics for graduate school said the same thing. Everyone I talked to was also at CAMPEP approved programs, so they were some of the best. Also, I know that for many schools when admission offers were made, most of them did not include information on funding either. People that were graduating (and job hunting) that I spoke with at these schools generally told me that finding jobs was extremely competitive as well.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
406
Back
Top