Other Should I memorize the source of formulas or just understand it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustave Ashab Behon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of remembering the sources and derivations of mathematical formulas versus simply understanding and memorizing the formulas themselves. Participants express that while understanding the derivation of formulas is important, it may not be necessary to memorize every source. Emphasis is placed on developing skills and a deep understanding of concepts rather than rote memorization. Some suggest that familiarity with the material will naturally enhance memory retention over time. The conversation also highlights the importance of applying formulas to problems and receiving feedback to solidify understanding. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards prioritizing comprehension and application over memorization of sources.
Mustave Ashab Behon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I always try to understand the source of a formula but later i cant remember it well, most of the time i completely forgets it. Should i memorize the sources of formulas also or just understand it? Is it necessary to make myself remember the sources always? I saw my friends can remember all the sources of formulas perfectly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think the answer is?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
What do you think the answer is?
I think i shouldn’t, but im getting confused
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shouldn't do what? Please write clearly, or we won't be able tp figure out what you are saying, much less help you.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and Mustave Ashab Behon
Vanadium 50 said:
Shouldn't do what? Please write clearly, or we won't be able tp figure out what you are saying, much less help you.
I think i shouldn’t memorize the sources of formulas, rather understand it and memorize the main formula
 
Mustave Ashab Behon said:
I always try to understand the source of a formula but later i cant remember it well, most of the time i completely forgets it. Should i memorize the sources of formulas also or just understand it? Is it necessary to make myself remember the sources always? I saw my friends can remember all the sources of formulas perfectly.
You can't function if you can't remember anything. The more you study, the more information you should retain. A lot of building up a solid memory of a subject should come naturally from familiarity with the material.

How much time you should spend explicitly memorising formulas depends on the context. For example, it may be sufficient to remember that there is a simple formula relating ##\sec^2 \theta## and ##\tan^2 \theta##. You can always look it up. But, if you forget that the two are related, then that may be more of a problem. Likewise, it may be sufficient to recognise that something is a standard integral - even if you then have to look it up. Or, remember the cases where trig substitutions tend to work.

As I've got older, I've found it more difficult to remember precise formulas. I still tend to remember that there is something. But, more and more, I have to look things up to get the precise formula. Like acceleration in polar coordinates. When I was a student 40 years ago, I would remember something like that without trying. Not any more.

You need to find a way of working that is successful given the amount of material that you can memorise precisely.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala, DeBangis21, phinds and 3 others
PeroK said:
For example, it may be sufficient to remember that there is a simple formula relating ##\sec^2⁡θ## and ##\tan^2⁡θ##. You can always look it up. But, if you forget that the two are related, then that may be more of a problem.
The formula that @PeroK refers to above is ##\sec^2\theta = \tan^2\theta + 1##, and there is a similar one that relates csc (cosecant) and cot (cotangent).

Both of these are derived from the identity ##\sin^2\theta + \cos^2\theta = 1##. By dividing both sides of this equation by, respectively, ##\cos^2\theta## and ##\sin^2\theta## you can get the tangent and secant identity or the cotangent and cosecant identity. My point is that it's possible to start from a basic identity or formula and derive others from it, making it unnecessary to memorize each and every identity or formula.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, phinds and Mustave Ashab Behon
Mustave Ashab Behon said:
I think i shouldn’t memorize the sources of formulas, rather understand it and memorize the main formula
Then, there you go. Very good to do that!
 
  • Like
Likes Mustave Ashab Behon
Mustave Ashab Behon said:
I always try to understand the source of a formula but later i cant remember it well, most of the time i completely forgets it. Should i memorize the sources of formulas also or just understand it? Is it necessary to make myself remember the sources always? I saw my friends can remember all the sources of formulas perfectly.
Most important are skills and understanding.
Next of importance if it is what you want, is to understand how the formulas were developed.

A person who is interested in academic success and ability to find employment should focus on understanding and skills.
 
  • Like
Likes Mustave Ashab Behon
  • #10
Sometimes on the path to understanding you need to start with memorization. In order to work with a formula, you need to remember what it is (or at least enough about it to know where to look it up).

After that you need to work with it, apply it to lots of problems, and make sure you get feedback so that you know when you're applying it correctly. Sometimes students develop a superficial understanding of a concept and then move on and end up struggling with it during examinations. In such situations, often, they understood a basic conceptualization, but didn't develop much skill in terms of the application. You want to get to a point where, when presented with a new problem that you haven't encountered before, you'll have enough experience to draw on that you'll be able to apply the concept or equation correctly. That's the deep understanding that you'll want to have.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and symbolipoint
  • #11
Mustave Ashab Behon said:
I always try to understand the source of a formula but later i cant remember it well, most of the time i completely forgets it
I'm curious what you mean by "source." Do you mean the name of the book where you read the formula? Or do you mean the derivation of the formula? The book is not important, the derivation is important.
 
  • #12
gmax137 said:
I'm curious what you mean by "source." Do you mean the name of the book where you read the formula? Or do you mean the derivation of the formula? The book is not important, the derivation is important.
A good bet is he means the originating source; the person or group which either discovered a relationship among quantities or who derived a formula at a time before other personnel made the derivation. He may too mean, from what book or what journal article; but these are for him to make clear for us.
 
Back
Top