Should I Mention Improved Grades After Adding Physics Major in My SOP?

AI Thread Summary
When crafting a statement of purpose for graduate school, it is important to focus on the narrative of academic growth and passion for the subject rather than dwelling on GPA specifics. The discussion highlights a transition from a Mathematics major to adding a Physics major, resulting in significant academic improvement. It suggests mentioning the decision to change majors and how it sparked a deeper interest in physics, which led to better performance. However, explicitly detailing GPA changes may not be necessary, as admissions committees will review transcripts and likely notice the upward trend in grades. Instead, the statement should emphasize future goals, interests in the graduate program, and relevant research areas, steering clear of a detailed recounting of undergraduate experiences.
MPKU
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I'm having a tough time beginning my statement of purpose for graduate school.

I'm just not necessarily sure if what I want to put in will hurt my chances.

I started off as a Mathematics major, and after taking Physics my junior year, I decided to add a Physics major. This would require me to stay 5 years total, graduating in May 14'.

At the end of my junior year my GPA was a 2.98 overall, and probably 2.8 in Math courses.

Over the following year (2 semesters), I took 1 math, 1 engineering, and 8 physics courses.
I earned 9 A's, and one A- (in a graduate level math course).

This semester, I should produce the same results, bringing my over GPA to 3.39 overall, Physics GPA: 3.8

So, what I'm asking then, is if it is wise to describe in my PS about how after I added my Physics major, my grade were substantially better? Or is this unnecessary?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't give you great advice, because I've never been on an admissions committee. However, my thoughts are:

1. It might be worthwhile to mention that you decided to be a physics major during your junior year, thus requiring you to do a fifth year. This can be part of the statement about what interests you physics, etc.

2. I'm not sure I'd mention the GPA bit. It should be obvious to anyone who looks at your transcripts that things got significantly better as you went. Also, you got high grades in your major and the major relevant to graduate school. While some people might miss this, I would also think they'll miss the poorer grades earlier on - they might just see the 3.8 in Physics and 3.4 overall and not look twice.

Of course I could be wrong. Maybe you should call attention to it. If you do, I would think it would be best to couch in terms of how physics really stimulated you, you decided to change majors, you started working harder and doing better, etc. I don't think I'd present it dryly, i.e. 'Once I changed majors, my GPA went from a 2.8 to a 3.8.'

Frankly though, a lot depends on what school you currently go to and what programs you are looking at.
 
I think you're overthinking this. Your SOP shouldn't involve a detailed synapses of your undergrad, but instead what you plan to do in graduate school, what you like about their grad program, what areas of research that they're conducting that interests you ect.

They will have your transcripts, so they will know your GPA and what classes you took. They will also be able to infer that you developed an interest in physics and did quite well. Instead of talking about GPA or that you added the major talk about UG research, ect.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
376
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Back
Top