Should I stick it out in EE with weak-ish math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BuddhaBelly34
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ee
AI Thread Summary
Concerns about making mathematical errors in electrical engineering (EE) are common among students, particularly those who grasp concepts but struggle with precision in calculations. While grades in foundational courses are important, they do not solely determine future success in the field, as practical experience and problem-solving skills become increasingly vital. Many engineers emphasize the importance of checking work and developing methods to catch mistakes, which can mitigate the impact of minor errors. A genuine interest in EE and a commitment to improving mathematical skills are crucial for long-term success. Ultimately, if the passion for the field persists, it is advisable to continue pursuing EE while enhancing mathematical proficiency.
  • #51
SophusLies said:
More like 5%. The EE students that I met in school were math and physics freaks. Some more math and some more physics but they certainly weren't just V = iR kids. They all knew a ridiculous amount of Fourier-stuff, complex analysis, vector calculus, PDE's (for Maxwell's equations), and probability.

I respect your opinion...and it's great to know all the stuff you described...but for 99% of us electrical engineers...it's not really going to be used in our work career.

EE's and physics guys are definietly two compeltely different animals. I did complete the EE program...and recently took the FE and PE. The principals I described above are 50% of school...the FE...and the PE. Yes, I'm speaking from experience. AC isn't all that different to me because V=IR in either case! Haha!...sorry, but as long as I'm this forum...i will never get away from that!

And sure those concepts above can be learned fairly quickly...however...mastering them will take years. And yes, the circuits you get in all the tests are going to be way more complicated then I described...but if you master those basic rules you can go a long, long way. And obviously learning way beyond that is goal...but for this young man...he hasn't even started his first day...but I wanted to give him a clear approach to what is coming...because proffesors are generally clear as mud.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
psparky said:
I respect your opinion...and it's great to know all the stuff you described...but for 99% of us electrical engineers...it's not really going to be used in our work career.

I see what you mean. I agree that in a job you won't use that much from school.
 
  • #53
psparky said:
but I wanted to give him a clear approach to what is coming...because proffesors are generally clear as mud.

so very true it hurts

my lab professor has some sort of disdain for teaching. he pushed back a lab so that we can, essentially, google the concepts.
 
  • #54
Voltage is Potential Difference - the difference between the Potential on one side and the potential on the other (= Across the gap). Nothing is 'going through' - until you give it a path. Then Current flows Through the load you connected.

If someone says "I had 240V going through me" then their language is more shocking than the experience they had!
 
  • #55
As a practicing EE, IMO psparky gave the OP 50% of EE *that you will use on the job*, but about 10% of the EE they will expect you to know at school.
 
  • #56
My first professor told me that getting his undergrad in EE was harder than both of his graduate degrees in the field. Do you guys feel the same?
 
  • #57
BuddhaBelly34 said:
My first professor told me that getting his undergrad in EE was harder than both of his graduate degrees in the field. Do you guys feel the same?

I just have an undergrad in EE so can't really help there.

However, you need to keep in mind there are many reasons why this professor found it so hard. Did he have inadequate high school preparation? Was it hard for him to develop good study habits? You really can't draw any conclusions from that one statement alone.
 
  • #58
He said that he "studied" by literally copying down the book word for word. So I would say his method of studying is rote learning.

Maybe he's just crazy. Cool guy though.
 
  • #59
BuddhaBelly34 said:
He said that he "studied" by literally copying down the book word for word. So I would say his method of studying is rote learning.

Maybe he's just crazy. Cool guy though.

The "harder" your courses are, the better for you in the long run. You are only going to work as hard as your prof's push you.

After you get your job...your GPA doesn't mean jack squat.

However, what you actually learned will matter imensely in the real world.
 
Last edited:
  • #60
To the original poster,
I just took the GRE recently and ended up with 760 on the math section...so yeah don't lose hope if u didnt do as well in high school...people end up doing better later on down the road...(i did better at penn state compared to HS and same thing with gre compared to HS) so yeah...depending on your undergrad institutions strength (my guess top 25 eng schools)...a B at min (of course higher the better) can signal u have understanding of the subject matter...a mix of A & B is def not bad at all by any means in engineering esp electrical eng...
and u can always work in some other field once u have a eng background... (maybe add a bus or liberal art minor maybe even linguistics lol)
 
  • #61
real10 said:
To the original poster,
I just took the GRE recently and ended up with 760 on the math section...so yeah don't lose hope if u didnt do as well in high school...people end up doing better later on down the road...(i did better at penn state compared to HS and same thing with gre compared to HS) so yeah...depending on your undergrad institutions strength (my guess top 25 eng schools)...a B at min (of course higher the better) can signal u have understanding of the subject matter...a mix of A & B is def not bad at all by any means in engineering esp electrical eng...
and u can always work in some other field once u have a eng background... (maybe add a bus or liberal art minor maybe even linguistics lol)

The uni I will attend is ranked like 50th or so. University of Texas at Dallas. Not bad considering it is only a satellite campus. Then again it was founded by the TI guys so there is a lot of expectations from the school I bet. The JuCo I am at now is nothing special, but I bet it's on par with most every state university (outside of the major ones).

I am certainly doing better now than in HS, and for these past few chapters I have done exceptionally well. I just would hate to have no future in the field but work my butt off for the degree.
 
  • #62
To be honest, shouldn't it be depended on what sub-areas of EE that the OP is pursuing?

If you're interested in circuit theory, math shouldn't be too bad in general, whereas in RF and Signal (Communications) math is used extensively.

I've taken courses in signals/communications and have done LOTS of Fourier stuff.
 
  • #63
charlesjeon said:
To be honest, shouldn't it be depended on what sub-areas of EE that the OP is pursuing?

If you're interested in circuit theory, math shouldn't be too bad in general, whereas in RF and Signal (Communications) math is used extensively.

I've taken courses in signals/communications and have done LOTS of Fourier stuff.

I agree. It not only depends on the sub-field, but also on the type of career the OP is interested in. Some electrical engineers will not use anything beyond arithmetic and basic algebra, some will get PhD's in signal processing which is a very math-intensive field.
 
  • #64
sweetpotato said:
I agree. It not only depends on the sub-field, but also on the type of career the OP is interested in. Some electrical engineers will not use anything beyond arithmetic and basic algebra, some will get PhD's in signal processing which is a very math-intensive field.

Coding Theory even requires abstract algebra!
 
  • #65
sweetpotato said:
I agree. It not only depends on the sub-field, but also on the type of career the OP is interested in. Some electrical engineers will not use anything beyond arithmetic and basic algebra, some will get PhD's in signal processing which is a very math-intensive field.

Aside from Algebra and Calculus, I was a bit surprised to learn just how much Statistics is involved in something like Computer Vision. It seems to be nearly all Statistics and Linear Algebra. BTW, OP, you shouldn't feel like you have to have everything that you'll ever need to know learned by the time you graduate. There will almost always be some sort of on the job training or if you're in more of an R&D type field, you'll be doing just that... Research (Learning) & Development. The biggest thing that the University's teach you is HOW to think and solve problems.
 
  • #66
eemichael83 said:
Aside from Algebra and Calculus, I was a bit surprised to learn just how much Statistics is involved in something like Computer Vision. It seems to be nearly all Statistics and Linear Algebra. BTW, OP, you shouldn't feel like you have to have everything that you'll ever need to know learned by the time you graduate. There will almost always be some sort of on the job training or if you're in more of an R&D type field, you'll be doing just that... Research (Learning) & Development. The biggest thing that the University's teach you is HOW to think and solve problems.

I agree at undergrad level CV it was more linear algebra (transformations)
on the other hand in almost all of EE -> statistics/probability is inherent and inescapable due to the ever present noise (real world situations) and modeling anything (data or noise) often requires one to characterize and identify it as part of a certain distribution (gaussian/normal seems appropriate most of the time...though uniform,rayleigh and others also pop up)
for example all that u learn at the start in EE most likely would be without statistics/prob (without noise) later on noise/real world factors make stat/prob more imp and make the same stuff harder (real world)

The funny thing about Fourier (series/transforms) is that the whole concept was invented to explain heat conduction in a metal rod...
EE people "stole" it ha!
 
Last edited:
  • #67
Most of you guys are young. There are likely to be many changes in your lives and your jobs in the next few decades. I think it is very risky to decide on a Maths-based career (EE is certainly one of those) whilst assuming that you will be able to pick and choose which bit of Maths you will be prepared to cope with on the way through.
The technical world has a habit of changing very quickly and this always involves some new Maths coming to the forefront.
If you have reservations in your attitude to Maths then do another (equally demanding and prestigious) job and avoid having to deal with it.
Anyone who hints that you will get away without X,Y or Z ("I don't do Calculus" etc.) could be leading you astray. Fact is that you may have to cope with X,Y and Z, if you want to carry on with your chosen EE career. This shouldn't matter as long as you make the adjustment at the time but don't rely on sneaking in under the Radar.
 
  • #68
Hey guys...I notice several of you using the word "maths".

I was going to say this is not correct...but when I looked it up in the dictionary...it is a word that is "chiefly British".

Interesting...in USA we say "math" whether it is singular or plural.

Learn something new everday...
 
  • #69
You chaps have a lot to learn about grammar and spelling! :smile:
 
  • #70
Well, if it seems to be more about which field I want to specialize in I'm pretty sure that's going to be electronics or power engineering. Hopefully power engineering.

Thanks for all the replies!
 
  • #71
Power engineering and electronics can involve statistics, DSP, a knowledge of materials, feedback systems, noise theory, solid state Physics, EM theory - you name it. That's if you plan to be at the World-shattering end of things.
But don't let that put you off. There is always a niche for someone who is keen enough.
 
  • #72
Hey Budda...here's an example of what I'm doing right now. I studied mainly electronics but now work mostly with power. V=IR either way.

Right now I'm doing the engineering for adding 2 - 350 HP motors to a factory. The motors are rated at 4,160 volts each. They are to be fed from 13,200 volt switchgear.

So I obviously need a transformer...more switchgear (large expensive breakers) after the transformer...and starters for each motor.

I have to size all the wires between each item I listed...use stress cones to connect them.

The transformer for this is huge. The Xformer is 8 feet wide...by 6 feet deep...by 7 feet tall! As you can see...we spend a lot of our time just seeing what will fit in a room not to mention the clearances you need between high voltage items.

For the switchgear after the xfmr...it will be three different cubes...400 amp main...followed by two 200 branch breakers...followed by starters. Those three cubes measure 9 feet wide by 7 feet deep!

Of course...the company hasn't decided whether they want a VFD or not...but in the meantime I'll put something together for the non VFD type.

This is real world engineering...and is happening right now! The toughest maths (haha!) I will use is either finding the overall KVA...or the current thru various parts. Pretty simple math! It's all preliminary what I'm doing...but this is how engineering works. You typically are missing a lot of information!

Incidentally...a starter is just a switch. Kinda like the light switch on the wall...but built massive to handle high voltage and high current. Almost all decent size motors need starters...unless they are VFD...then the VFD is the starter.

There is also a control wire that controls the starters. Whether it be a thermostat...pressure guage...or whatever. The signal excites the magnetic field in the starter relay and closes the contacts...therefore starting the motor and keeping it running until the "off" signal comes in.
 
Last edited:
  • #73
While I don't know what all of it means the idea that your are creating something like that makes me extremely jealous! haha

-------------------------------------------------------
And as for the maths things, I think it has to do with:
Sciences - physics, chemistry, biology, etc
Maths - algebra, trigonometry, calculus, differential eqs, etc.

While math can be thought of as the entire field of mathematics, maths can be thought of as the individual components of the field.

JUST MY GUESS THOUGH, I'm definitely not a brit and I am about the furthest you can get from being an English major.
 
  • #74
BuddhaBelly34 said:
While I don't know what all of it means the idea that your are creating something like that makes me extremely jealous! haha

-------------------------------------------------------
And as for the maths things, I think it has to do with:
Sciences - physics, chemistry, biology, etc
Maths - algebra, trigonometry, calculus, differential eqs, etc.

While math can be thought of as the entire field of mathematics, maths can be thought of as the individual components of the field.

JUST MY GUESS THOUGH, I'm definitely not a brit and I am about the furthest you can get from being an English major.

Incidentally Budda...why do we need or use all these silly little breakers?

What's their use...think about it and reply.
 
  • #75
As for the 'Maths', if you are just starting in learning Math subjects like Derivatives and Integrals, etc.. OR if you've been out of it for a bit and just want to brush up and review some things, I've found this guy to be very helpful and easy to learn (review) with: http://www.youtube.com/user/khanacademy?ob=0&feature=results_main
 
  • #76
Thanks michael83 I subscribed to that guy.

As for why do we need all those things its essentially to scale down the power from the grid to be appropriate for the motors right? I didn't know off hand the function of any of those objects (except the transformer).
 
  • #77
BuddhaBelly34 said:
Thanks michael83 I subscribed to that guy.

As for why do we need all those things its essentially to scale down the power from the grid to be appropriate for the motors right? I didn't know off hand the function of any of those objects (except the transformer).

Good guess...transformers certainly change voltages...power in equals power out. So if you have 10,000 volts at 1000 amps...and you are dropping to voltage to 2400 volts...your amps will now climb to 4,160 amps...P=IV...remember...again, power in equals power out.

Now to breakers...these are the breakers that are in your electrical panel at home or in your apartment or whatever. Sometimes they "trip" and you need to reset them for whatever reason.

Why did they trip...well...take a typical 20 amp breaker in your house. Now let's say mom is busy and a 10 year old decides to play with two wires in a receptacle. He decides to touch them together. There is no resistance when they touch...so massive current goes thru the breaker and "trips" it. The outlet is no longer energized.

Now...let's say we don't have a breaker. Chilld touches two bare wires together...now there is a massive flow of current. The wires in your house start to melt and burn...everntually starting on fire...the transformer on your pole outside blows up...the wires running down the street turn bright red and you start the entire neighborhood on fire.

Ok...you can see breakers are to protect the wires! and the buildings the wires are in. Breakers are there to protect against short circuits...or overloads of amps.

And yes...the breakers in factories are gigantic compared to your house panel. A house 20 amp breaker can cost $5. A 13,200 volt 800 amp breaker in a factory could cost $100,000!
Big difference!

Contrary to poplular belief...breakers are not there to protect your human body. If you are getting shocked...not even 1 amp will be going thru your body. The breaker feels nothing and is perfectly happy...it will not trip! However...the GFCI receptacle in your bathroom or kitchen will trip in a shock situation!
 
  • #78
psparky said:
Good guess...transformers certainly change voltages...power in equals power out. So if you have 10,000 volts at 1000 amps...and you are dropping to voltage to 2400 volts...your amps will now climb to 4,160 amps...P=IV...remember...again, power in equals power out.

Now to breakers...these are the breakers that are in your electrical panel at home or in your apartment or whatever. Sometimes they "trip" and you need to reset them for whatever reason.

Why did they trip...well...take a typical 20 amp breaker in your house. Now let's say mom is busy and a 10 year old decides to play with two wires in a receptacle. He decides to touch them together. There is no resistance when they touch...so massive current goes thru the breaker and "trips" it. The outlet is no longer energized.

Now...let's say we don't have a breaker. Chilld touches two bare wires together...now there is a massive flow of current. The wires in your house start to melt and burn...everntually starting on fire...the transformer on your pole outside blows up...the wires running down the street turn bright red and you start the entire neighborhood on fire.

Ok...you can see breakers are to protect the wires! and the buildings the wires are in. Breakers are there to protect against short circuits...or overloads of amps.

And yes...the breakers in factories are gigantic compared to your house panel. A house 20 amp breaker can cost $5. A 13,200 volt 800 amp breaker in a factory could cost $100,000!
Big difference!

Contrary to poplular belief...breakers are not there to protect your human body. If you are getting shocked...not even 1 amp will be going thru your body. The breaker feels nothing and is perfectly happy...it will not trip! However...the GFCI receptacle in your bathroom or kitchen will trip in a shock situation!
Considering we are way off topic now anyway this is a good time to ask:

I was skimming over the breaker article on Wikipedia and I saw that it said something about using oil/gas (not natural gas obv) to break the arc. Doesn't that seem a bit insane. Aren't all oils flammable?
 
  • #79
BuddhaBelly34 said:
Considering we are way off topic now anyway this is a good time to ask:

I was skimming over the breaker article on Wikipedia and I saw that it said something about using oil/gas (not natural gas obv) to break the arc. Doesn't that seem a bit insane. Aren't all oils flammable?

Not sure...but it would only make sense that the oil/gas activate the mechanical device that opens the switch. The oil/gas would be fully insulated from the "arc" part.

Otherwise...yes, it would explode or burn.
 
  • #81
Ah, that link helped quite a bit. I was trying to wrap my head around that.

Also, I can't believe I didn't think of oil being used to break the arc by activating a mechanical device. Obviously I was not reading or thinking very critically this morning.

But dang those breakers can get massive.
 
  • #82
BuddhaBelly34 said:
Ah, that link helped quite a bit. I was trying to wrap my head around that.

Also, I can't believe I didn't think of oil being used to break the arc by activating a mechanical device. Obviously I was not reading or thinking very critically this morning.

But dang those breakers can get massive.

I don't know much about the subject of oil breakers...but I will just throw out some random thoughts.

Perhaps the oil does surround the contactors. If so...when the contactors separated to be in the off position...there would be no air...therfore no arc!

Just a thought.

But then again...when the contactors went to close they would have oil on them possibly adding resistance...then again...maybe not. Perhaps the current would flow just lovely.

Again...just random...ramblings. I could google the subject...but that would just be no fun:)
 
  • #83
I was thinking that oil may not work as an insulator because it is essentially "wet"...

But it turns out that oil does not conduct electricity because there are no charge carriers in it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Back
Top