Should I study Analysis before Linear Algebra?

AI Thread Summary
Reading a proofs book is not essential before studying linear algebra, as a solid introductory book on linear algebra with proofs can suffice. Many find linear algebra easier than analysis, although some analysis texts may require knowledge of linear algebra concepts like n-tuples and vector norms. Certain analysis books can be independent of linear algebra, focusing instead on single-variable calculus theory. Recommended resources include "Understanding Analysis" by Abbot for analysis and "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Axler for linear algebra. While reading a proofs book can be beneficial for those unfamiliar with proofs, it is not a strict requirement.
terrytosh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Or is reading a proofs book enough
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you don't need to study analysis before linear algebra.

And if you get a good introductory book on LA (with proofs!) then there is no need to first read a "proofs book", either. In fact, I think such a book on LA would make for a good "proofs book" by itself.
 
terrytosh said:
Or is reading a proofs book enough
Linear Algebra, at least for me, was easier than analysis.

Depending on the analysis book you choose to study from. It may require a bit of background from linear algebra. Ie., what is an n-tuple , norm of a vector , and some other topics.

Or the analysis book can be independent of linear algebra. Ie., it is a review of single-variable calculus, but now you work through the theory of it.

A very good intro analysis book is Understanding Analysis by Abbot.
A good Linear Algebra (theory) is Linear Algebra Done Right by Axler.

You do not necessarily need to read a proofs book, but it does not hurt to read one. Especially if you are not familiar proofs.

A good proof method book is by Hammok. A pdf of the book can be legally downloaded.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top