Should I take Elementary Linear Algebra before Analysis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether to take Elementary Linear Algebra (MATH 341) before Intro to Analysis (MATH 413). The original poster is considering their course load, which includes two economics classes and a part-time job, and is unsure if they can manage all four classes simultaneously. Participants emphasize the benefits of understanding linear algebra concepts, particularly the abstract nature of vector spaces, which can aid in grasping analysis. While some argue that linear algebra is beneficial and often a prerequisite for analysis at many institutions, others suggest that it is not strictly necessary to succeed in analysis. A specific recommendation is made for the book "Linear Algebra Done Wrong" by Professor Sergei Treil, which is available for free and is used in reputable institutions.
andyroo
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I have yet to take Elementary Linear Algebra MATH 341, but I am currently signed up for Intro to Analysis MATH 413. I'm about to complete Elementary Analysis MATH 315. I could take MATH 341 and MATH 413 at the same time, but I'm already signed up for two other economics classes that I feel I should probably take this fall term. I'd take all 4 classes at the same time, but I have a job that's about 15 hours a week as well, so I'm not sure if taking all 4 would be a good idea. Overall, I'm asking if anyone thinks I should take linear algebra before this analysis course? Thanks.

-Andy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found that being comfortable with the abstract setting of a vector space helped when I was introduced to other general algebraic structures. We must be used to generalization when thinking about analysis. That said, linear algebra deals a lot with discrete (separate) objects like matrices and ℝn (positive integer n), while analysis explicitly formalizes the continuous (complete) nature of the reals.

I think a real analysis course will use properties of ℝn a lot. There is a lot of stuff in linear algebra you probably won't even need to know about to discuss analysis, but I personally think you should take linear algebra first. It's not terrible if you can't, though, you'll be fine.
 
In a number of schools, a course like Intro to Analysis has Linear Algebra as a prerequisite. If this is Oregon we're talking about, I find it curious that MATH 413 does not require MATH 341 as a prerequisite. I'm with Dr. Seafood -- you should take MATH 341 first.
 
Andyroo:

There is a wonderful book called "Linear Algebra Done Wrong" by Professor Sergei Treil.
(The title is a play on the title of Axler's popular book "Linear Algebra Done Right")
Professor Treil's book is used by Caltech for Intro Linear Algebra as well as at Brown Where Treil teaches) for Honors Linear Algebra. The book is free and can be downloaded at the following link: http://www.math.brown.edu/~treil/papers/LADW/LADW.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top