Should I Take P-Chem: Advice for CE Seniors

  • Thread starter Thread starter FiguringItOut
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges and perceptions surrounding physical chemistry (P-chem) for students in chemical engineering and related fields. A senior in chemical engineering expresses concern about the difficulty of P-chem but acknowledges an interest in the subject and its relevance for graduate studies. Another participant, a physics student, counters the negative reputation of P-chem, suggesting that it is manageable, especially for those who have already completed thermodynamics. The conversation highlights the importance of P-chem in advanced studies while reassuring students that prior knowledge can ease the learning process.
FiguringItOut
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I don't have to take it. I will be a senior in chemical engineering next semester and plan on going to graduate school. I have heard nothing but horror stories about P-chem, but I can't help but 1) have a slight interest in the topics (I've already taken 2 semesters of thermo), and 2)feel I will need it in grad school. If anyone has any guidance on the subject, please let me know!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From which perspective should we be advising you?

I am a physics student and taking a year of P chem for fun and breadth.
 
Physical chemistry is not a nightmare. If you have already taken thermodynamics then you are fine.
 

Thread 'Applied Math PhD candidate but I hate group theory'

TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
View full post »

Thread 'Where did all the “fundamentals-deepening” master’s programs go?'

I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
View full post »

Similar threads

Other Would it be advisable to take an extra year before graduating?
Replies
8
Views
3K
Programs What Should I Prepare for as a Junior Chemical Engineering Transfer Student?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Courses Should I take Calculus 2 my freshman year of college?
Replies
22
Views
6K
Other Postpone Senior Year to get Better Grades to go to a Competitive Grad?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Other Could/Should I still go for a PhD?
Replies
4
Views
959
Other Need advice on the Physics Programs I can realistically apply to
Replies
6
Views
2K
Courses Should I withdraw from a class?
Replies
40
Views
5K
Schools Will grad schools see what I take senior spring?
Replies
3
Views
1K
Courses Advanced Math for Computational Material Science Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
Testing Should I CLEP Out of General Chemistry to Take Astrophysics?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top