Schools Should I take University Physics early and study ahead or as last two

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student's dilemma about whether to take physics courses at their junior college before transferring to the University of Virginia (UVa). The student is undecided between majoring in physics, computer science, or mathematics and is considering a double major. They have arranged their courses to meet the qualifications for these programs and are contemplating whether to take the physics sequence now or wait until after transferring to UVa. Participants emphasize the importance of taking the calculus-based, rigorous physics courses early to allow for better retention and understanding. They suggest that taking the courses now would provide an opportunity to reinforce concepts and prepare for advanced studies at UVa. The student acknowledges this advice, recognizing the benefits of early learning and the chance to study ahead during the time without formal physics classes.
ActionPotential
Messages
60
Reaction score
4
Couldn't fit everything in the subject line, my apologies.

I am at a Junior College still undecided as to whether I want to major in physics, computer science, or mathematics (considering double major in physics/comp sci and a minor in math but that's not really releveant).

Because of this dilemma, I have arranged my courses so that I will meet all of the qualifications for these three programs upon my transfer to UVa (which I will then decide my major(s)). Our JC only offers two physics courses (University Physics I and II) but I have 3-4 semesters of JC left.

Should I take the physics sequence now and then study ahead during the 1-2 semesters before I transfer, or should I take the physics courses the last two semesters I transfer so that it is fresh in my brain when I am able to take more physics courses at UVa?

Thanks for any help or suggestions. I appreciate your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it calculus based? If so, and assuming you will get credit for it, it may be better to do it early so you have time for it to sink in. Just my 2c.
 
Always better to learn something earlier than later IMO. In your year without physics classes you can choose to improve your understanding of the physics you studied, or like you said, study more advanced topics on your own.
 
verty said:
Is it calculus based? If so, and assuming you will get credit for it, it may be better to do it early so you have time for it to sink in. Just my 2c.

They are calculus based and actually very rigorous courses. The way Virginia is set-up, our Community College system has transfer agreements with various institutions so the core science courses that are taught tend to represent courses taught at the state Universities.

And, while I have not taken the courses, based on the descriptions at my JC and the descriptions at UVa (University of Virginia), these two courses *seem* to condense four courses into two (I suppose it's to weed-out community college applicants attempting to transfer into engineering programs).

I will be taking maths all the way up to differential equations (including linear algebra and vector calc) at the junior college before transferring.

ahsanxr said:
Always better to learn something earlier than later IMO. In your year without physics classes you can choose to improve your understanding of the physics you studied, or like you said, study more advanced topics on your own.

This makes a lot of sense. I can use the time to reinforce/review concepts that I don't quite understand and/or study ahead in preparation of taking high-level courses at UVa.

Thanks to both of you for confirming my initial thought (better to learn early than late). I appreciate your opinions and perspectives.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top