Should I Transfer for Nuclear Engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WatermelonPig
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the decision-making process regarding pursuing a degree in mechanical engineering (ME) versus nuclear engineering (NE). The individual is currently studying mechanical engineering and is contemplating transferring to a nuclear engineering program, which would extend their graduation timeline and incur additional costs. They express concerns about lacking laboratory or internship experience, which is crucial for future graduate studies in nuclear engineering. Participants in the discussion advise against transferring, suggesting that completing the mechanical engineering degree would provide greater versatility and marketability in the job market. They emphasize that a mechanical engineering degree allows for broader career opportunities, including the option to pursue a master's in nuclear engineering later. The consensus is that mechanical engineering is a more flexible and marketable choice, and that it is indeed possible to enter a nuclear engineering master's program with a background in mechanical engineering, provided the individual maintains strong academic performance and gains relevant experience.
WatermelonPig
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
I've been studying mechanical engineering this past year. It's been going good. Except now I realize I should have gone for a nuclear engineering degree at another university. On my current schedule, I could graduate with a degree in mechanical engineering 3 years with some nuclear classes thrown in. (3 years due to community college and AP credit in high school) Transferring would mean 4 years for graduation and also tons of money lost. On the other hand, the classwork would be a bit better. In addition, I have yet to have a laboratory or internship experience and I don't know how I'm going to get one of these anytime soon considering I've never held any (paying) job anytime in my life. So 4 years would give me more time to gain experience. I'm also interested in studying nuclear engineering in grad school and I know that you can't just say you have a 4.0 you need at least a year or so experience on a legit research team. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would finish your BS in mechanical engineering and then get a masters in nuclear engineering if you are still interested at that time. You will be much more versatile (and marketable) with both degrees.
 
edgepflow said:
I would finish your BS in mechanical engineering and then get a masters in nuclear engineering if you are still interested at that time. You will be much more versatile (and marketable) with both degrees.

I think that's really good advice. The nuclear field looks a bit dicey right now - well, there are PFers who work in the field who would know first-hand, I'll let them chime in.

ME is very marketable, though.
 
I mean can get into a MS thesis program just based on grades and maybe one good internship? If my MS thesis is good enough will that be enough to eventually apply later to a PhD program?
 
lisab said:
ME is very marketable, though.

Additionally, the converse is true for NE. If you have a degree in nuclear engineering, you will be in the general sense confined to that field. Whereas an ME degree will allow you to do a multitude of things (for instance, get a masters in nuclear engineering).

ME is more versatile and more marketable. I actually was in a similar situation as watermelon, and decided to stay at my current school and stick with ME (and pick up math, because who doesn't love math?) for the above-mentioned reasons.

I'm not sure that I fully understand your last post, but if your question is would you be able to get into a nuclear engineering MS program with an ME degree, the answer is yes absolutely.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top