Should we replace traditional grading methods with lie detector tests?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmarinas86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the sarcastic suggestion of using lie detector tests as a grading tool in education, based on the belief that they are highly accurate. Participants express skepticism about the accuracy of lie detectors, estimating their reliability to be between 88% and 92%, rather than the claimed 99%. Concerns are raised about the implications of using such tests in education, particularly regarding individual differences and potential biases against those with physiological issues. The consensus is that lie detectors measure confidence in responses rather than the correctness of answers, making them unsuitable for grading purposes. Overall, the conversation critiques the practicality and ethical considerations of implementing lie detectors in educational settings.
kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
<sarcasm>Since lie detector tests are very very accurate (like 99%), we should use them as an alternative for human grading. So what do you think? I believe it would obviously work due to the use of the lie detector test in law enforcement. It can save the teacher a lot of time because since the lie detector test knows what is a lie and what is a truth, rather than what is a matter of opinion, feeling, or subjective subconscious inference, it can be used to assess the correctness or wrongness of essays, mutiple choice answers etc. All we have to do is to connect the student to a lie detector while they are giving responses to questions!</sarcasm>
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh...ok?
Did one of your teachers suggest this or something?
 
I think I could beat the test.
 
They aren't 99% accurate.

They probably usually range between 88% and 92% accurate.

Note: I searched for some reference, but couldn't find a good one. My searches get flooded with anti-polygraph sites and other non-sense.

Should we use for educational purposes? If your goal is to reduce your freedoms, then yeah, but for me, hell no.
 
Last edited:
JasonRox said:
They aren't 99% accurate.

They probably usually range between 88% and 92% accurate.

Note: I searched for some reference, but couldn't find a good one. My searches get flooded with anti-polygraph sites and other non-sense.

Should we use for educational purposes? If your goal is to reduce your freedoms, then yeah, but for me, hell no.

Of course. But I am 100% sure that the those percentage of accuracy cannot be replicated for all individuals. I am 100% sure that it has some level bias particulary against those with physiological problems or differences. Otherwise we could use them for education gdamit. So why don't we? We could save billions in education (if it actually does what it claims!)

Just divide by .88 or .92 to get the real grade!
 
Last edited:
Even if it's accuracy were 99%, a lie detector would only show whether the amount of confidence the person had in his answer, not whether the answer were actually correct.
 
BobG said:
Even if it's accuracy were 99%, a lie detector would only show whether the amount of confidence the person had in his answer, not whether the answer were actually correct.

<sarcasm>No. I believe that a lie detector test can detect lies. It can determine which philosophies are invalid.</sarcasm>
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
101
Views
12K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top