Show a certain sequence in Q, with p-adict metric is cauchy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a sequence defined in the rational numbers with the p-adic metric. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating that the sequence \( s_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} (t_k \cdot p^k) \) is Cauchy, while also noting that its equivalence class cannot be expressed as a rational number. The sequence \( t_n \) follows a specific pattern: 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, etc.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss examining the difference \( |s_n - s_m| \) and consider what power of \( p \) divides this expression. There is a suggestion to analyze the p-adic absolute value of the partial series from \( m+1 \) to \( n \) to establish the Cauchy criterion.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's approach, indicating that they believe the reasoning is on the right track. There is an acknowledgment of the general principle that a series converges in \( \mathbb{Q}_p \) if its terms approach zero in the p-adic metric, which may relate to the proof being developed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the proof, despite familiarity with the p-adic metric and Cauchy sequences. There is an emphasis on the need for a clear plan to demonstrate the properties of the sequence.

arturo_026
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I left this following question from my excercises last, hoping that solving the others will give me an insight onto how to proceed. But I still don't have a plan on how to start it:

Consider the sequence s_n = Ʃ (k=0 to n) (t_k * p^k) in Q(rationals) with the p-adic metric (p is prime); where t_n is the sequence 1,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,2,... Show that s_n is Cauchy, but [s_n] (the equivalence class of s_n) cannot be expressed by a rational number.

As far as what I know: I'm familiar with the p-adic metric, and what a cauchy sequence is. I just can't think of how to show that s_n is cauchy.

Thank you very much for any advice and hints.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at |s_n - s_m|. What power of p will divide this?
 
morphism said:
Look at |s_n - s_m|. What power of p will divide this?

Will it be the p-adic absolute value of the partial series from m+1 to n, so that way if I choose N large enough so p^-N is larger or equal to such series (for any n), and p^-N≥ε , then s_n will satisfy the cauchy criterion.
 
Last edited:
I think you have the right idea.
 
morphism said:
I think you have the right idea.

Great! thank you very much. I'll work on cleaning it up.
 
No problem. By the way, in general, a series ##\sum a_n## converges in ##\mathbb Q_p## iff ##a_n \to 0## in the p-adic metric (compare to the case in ##\mathbb R## or ##\mathbb C##!). The proof of this general statement should be similar to the proof you're writing up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K