Show a sequence of amounts are a geometric series

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the sequence R(1+i)^(n-1) + R(1+i)^(n-2) + ... + R is a geometric series related to compound interest. Participants highlight that the sequence can be expressed in the form R(1+i)^n, with a constant ratio of (1+i) between consecutive terms. This constant ratio confirms that the sequence meets the criteria for a geometric series. The proof is deemed straightforward, emphasizing the simplicity of identifying the geometric nature of the series. Overall, the conversation clarifies the relationship between the sequence and geometric series definitions.
yourmom98
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
i am given a set of amounts R(1+i)^(n-1)+R(1+i)^(n-2)+... R(1+i)^1,R and so on it has to do with compound interest.
how do i prove this is a geometric series?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yourmom98 said:
i am given a set of amounts R(1+i)^(n-1)+R(1+i)^(n-2)+... R(1+i)^1,R and so on it has to do with compound interest.
how do i prove this is a geometric series?


look at the definition of a geometric series, and try to see how this example satisfies it.
 
well i know that is satisfies it they are in the form of a geometric series but how do i show this? and actually PROVE it.
 
Well it's clear that the corresponding sequence R\left( {1 + i} \right)^0 ,R\left( {1 + i} \right)^1 ,R\left( {1 + i} \right)^2 , \ldots ,R\left( {1 + i} \right)^{n - 1} ,R\left( {1 + i} \right)^n has the general term R\left( {1 + i} \right)^n.

The ratio between two terms of the sequence is always \left( {1 + i} \right), a constant, just what we need for a geometric sequence -> this gives of course a geometric series.
 
yeah, it was actually a pretty straightforward question! you might have expected it to be harder than it was...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top