Show dim U <= n in Vector Subspace of C2n

  • Thread starter Thread starter brru25
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a vector subspace U of C2n defined by the condition that the sum of the products of its components is zero for any two vectors in U. The goal is to demonstrate that the dimension of U is less than or equal to n.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the summation condition and explore concepts of linear independence and inner products. Some express confusion about the nature of the product involved and whether it refers to multiplication or complex conjugation. Others consider specific cases, such as the 2D scenario, to clarify the conditions imposed on the vectors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify the problem statement and its implications. Some have proposed starting points for examples and further exploration of the properties of vectors in U, while others are questioning the assumptions and definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the exact nature of the product in the summation condition, leading to different interpretations among participants. Additionally, the original poster has confirmed the problem statement as presented, contributing to the confusion in the discussion.

brru25
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let U be a vector subspace of C2n such that
sum(xi*yi) = 0 for 1 <= i <= 2n for any x, y ∈ U. Show that dim U <= n. Give an example of such a subspace U with dim U = n

2. The attempt at a solution

I tried just writing out the summation and was thinking along the lines of linear independence but I don't think that applies here (maybe it does, I'm not sure). Could I think of a linear map contained in U that maps two vectors x and y to be the sum = 0? I think I'm confusing myself here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i'm not sure i understand the question correctly... so is that effectively the compex innner product of 2 vectors in the subsapce is always zero?

[tex]<\texbf{x},\texbf{y}> = \sum_i x_i^* y_i[/tex]

but if that were the case, as U is a vector space, if x is in U, then so is c.x, but
[tex]<\texbf{x},\texbf{cx}> = c||x||^2[/tex]
contradiction?
 
Maybe by * he meant multiplication rather than complex conjugation? We'll have to wait for him to clarify, I guess.
 
Glad you guys (lanedance and Hurkyl) jumped in on this one. I was thinking along the lines that lanedance described, except I was thinking of this product of a vector with itself.
[tex]\sum_{i = 1}^{2n} x_i*x_i~=~0[/tex]
which suggests that all the x_i's are 0.
 
it's multiplication not conjugate (sorry about the mix-up everybody!)
 
brru25, You're sure you have given us the exact problem description, right?
 
positive, word-for-word...see why I'm confused? :-)
 
ok, think I'm getting it now, sounds like what Hurkyl was thinking...

I haven't worked it, but would start with an example in the 2D case in [itex]\mathbb{C}^2[/itex], so n = 1

so say you have a vector (a,b) which is in U, it satisfies the rule with itself
[tex]\sum_i x_i^2 = a^2 + b^2 = 0[/tex]

so, first can you find a vector that satisfies above... and 2nd can you show given a vector in U, there can be no other linearly independent vectors in U?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K