Show that for a symmetric or normal matrix

MatthewD
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Is there anyway to show that for a symmetric or normal matrix A, that det(A) = \prod \lambda_i without using Jordan blocks? I want to show this result using maybe unitary equivalence and other similar matrices... any ideas? It's obviously easy with JCF...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't know what is the function of JCF in it...it simply follows from the well known Caley-Hamilton Theorem (Every square matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation) and the result holds for any square matrix.
 


Do I have to use Cayley-Hamilton? Could I use the fact that A would be orthogonally equivalent to a diagonal matrix by defintion of symmetric, so for some orthogonal matrix Q and diagonal matrix D:
A=Q*DQ
then det(A)=det(Q*DQ)=det(D)
D is diagonal=>det(D)=product of diagonal entries... but how would I show these are the eigenvalues?
if they're the eigenvalues, then i have my result since similar matrices have the same eigenvalues...
 


Every symmetric, or normal, matrix, A, can be diagonalized- that is, there exist an invertible matrix P such that PAP^{-1}= D where D is a diagonal matrix having the eigenvalues of A on its diagonal.

Now det(PAP^{-1})=det(P)det(A)det(P)^{-1}= det(A)= det(D) and that last is, of course, the product of the eigenvalues.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top