
This is ridiculous. I feel like your original substitution should work. Let's back up a little here. It is being claimed that
[tex]
<br />
\int_{t=0}^\infty t^{x}e^{-t}\,dt = <br />
e^{-x}x^{x+1/2}\int_{u = -\sqrt{x}}^\infty e^{-\sqrt{x}u}\left (1 +\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}}\right )^x\,du <br />
\qquad(8)[/tex]
Now I believe that what you were trying to say is that if we compare
coefficients of like powers of x, we might infer a substitution. So we might say that [itex]t = 1+u/\sqrt{x}\Rightarrow dt = du\sqrt{x}[/itex] would make a good substitution. Doing so yields:
[tex]
\int_{u = -\sqrt{x}}^\infty (1+\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})^x*<br />
e^{-(1+\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})}\,\frac{du}{\sqrt{x}}\qquad (9)[/tex]
Which is getting much closer to the right-hand-side of (8). As a matter of fact, if we equate the RHS of (8) to (9), we have:
[tex]
e^{-x}x^{x+1/2}\int_{u = -\sqrt{x}}^\infty e^{-\sqrt{x}u}\left (1 +\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}}\right )^x\,du <br />
=<br />
\int_{u = -\sqrt{x}}^\infty (1+\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})^x*<br />
e^{-(1+\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})}\,\frac{du}{\sqrt{x}}<br />
\qquad(10)[/tex]
So I need to show that this is an identity. I start by integrating the RHS of (10) by parts. Letting [itex]u^* = (1 + u/\sqrt{x})^x\Rightarrow du^* = x(1 + u/\sqrt{x})^{x-1}/\sqrt{x}\,du[/itex] and let [itex]dv = e^{-(1+u/\sqrt{x})}du\Rightarrow v = -\sqrt{x}e^{-(1+u/\sqrt{x})}[/itex]
Then our integral becomes:
[tex]
I = <br />
u^*v - \int v\,du^* = \left [\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}*(1 + \frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})^x*-\sqrt{x}e^{-(1+\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})}\right ]_{u=\sqrt{x}}^\infty<br />
\quad - \quad<br />
\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}\int_{u=\sqrt{x}}^\infty (1+\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}}^{x-1}\,du\qquad(11)[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow I = x\int_{u=\sqrt{x}}^\infty \sqrt{x}e^{-(1+\frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})}(1 + \frac{u}{\sqrt{x}})^{x-1}\,du<br />
\qquad(12)[/tex]