Show that Geodesic is space-like everywhere

  • Thread starter Thread starter wam_mi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesic
wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If the geodesic is space-like somewhere, show that the geodesic is space-like everywhere.

Homework Equations



Geodesic equation: \ddot{X}^{\mu}+\Gamma^{\mu}_{\alpha \beta}\dot{X}^{\alpha}\dot{X}^{\beta} = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



I looked at the metric

ds^{2} = g_{\alpha \beta} \dot{X}^{\alpha} \dot{X}^{\beta} = + 1,

where g_{\alpha \beta} is the general curved metric in 4 dimensions of space-time. I try to write it in the form

g_{\alpha \beta} \dot{X}^{\alpha} \dot{X}^{\beta} = g_{\alpha \beta} \dot{X'}^{\alpha} \dot{X'}^{\beta}

where X is in one frame while X' is in another.

What exactly do I need to do now? I'm confused...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it. Is it correct to say if one puts the inner product into the parallel transport expression, one finds that the expression vanishes as parallel transport preserves the inner product such that the character of the geodesic never changes.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top