MHB Show that in every set p2 with more than three vectors is linearly dependent.

delgeezee
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
i know S = { $$1 , x, x^2$$} is linearly dependent set for p2. where $$(a_0, a_1, a_2) = (0,0,0) $$
I wanted to use the Wronskian on { $$1 , x, x^2, x^3$$} , but as I understand, it only proves linear independence and not the converse.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
delgeezee said:
i know S = { $$1 , x, x^2$$} is linearly dependent set for p2. where $$(a_0, a_1, a_2) = (0,0,0) $$
I wanted to use the Wronskian on { $$1 , x, x^2, x^3$$} , but as I understand, it only proves linear independence and not the converse.

Hi delgeezee!

Can you elaborate?
For starters, what do you mean by p2?
And how do your $a_i$ tie in?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K