Show that killing vector field satisfies....

Augbrah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to do past exam papers in GR but there are some things I don't yet feel comfortable with, so even though I can do some parts of the question I would be very happy if you could check my solution. Thank you!

1. Homework Statement

Spacetime is stationary := there exists a coord chart with a timelike coordinate x^0 such that metric components \partial_0 g_{\mu \nu} = 0.
Spacetime is static := there exists a coord chart such that \partial_0 g_{\mu \nu} = 0 and g_{0i} = 0

i) [Done] Show that spacetime is stationary if and only if there exists a timelike Killing vector field V.
ii) [Done] Show that if spacetime is static, there exists a timelike Killing vector field satisfying V_{[\alpha}\nabla_\mu V_{v]}=0
iii) Let V be timelike Killing vector field with V_{[\alpha}\nabla_\mu V_{v]}=0. Show that this condition implies \nabla_\mu(|V|^n V_\nu)-\nabla_\nu(|V|^n V_\mu)=0 Where |V|^2=V_a V^a and n is integer which should be determined.

Homework Equations


Killing vector field V satisfies \nabla_\mu V_\nu + \nabla_\nu V_\mu = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


i) I have done this part. For timelike V^\mu we can find an inertial frame s.t. V^\mu = \delta^\mu_0. Then V_\mu = g_{\mu 0}. Hence \nabla_\mu V_\nu + \nabla_\nu V_\mu =...=\partial_0 g_{\mu\nu}, by expressing Christoffel symbols as partial derivatives of a metric other derivatives nicely cancel.

So we proved that timelike Killing V ⇔ \partial_0 g_{\mu\nu}=0.

ii) If spacetime is static, it is also stationary, so we already know from i) there must exist timelike Killing V, just need to show it satisfied the equation (right?). By expanding antisymmetrization we have
V_{\alpha}(\nabla_\mu V_{\nu} - \nabla_\nu V_{\mu}) + \text{(other 2 cyclicly permuted pairs)}=0 Studying the first term and using same identification V_\mu = g_{\mu 0} and as before remembering that for static spacetime g_{0i} = 0 as well as \partial_0 g_{\mu \nu} = 0 we get:
V_{\alpha}(\nabla_\mu V_{\nu} - \nabla_\nu V_{\mu}) = g_{\alpha 0} (\partial_\mu g_{\nu 0} - \partial_\nu g_{\mu 0}) = 0

Same procedure for other two terms and total sum is 0.

iii) Besides product rule I did not got far. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should probably how far you got with part (iii).
 
I might be missing something but I don't think what you wrote at the end of part ii) is correct. If you put μ=i and ν=0 this is not zero but equal to g_{\alpha 0}\partial_i g_{00} which is not necessarily zero
You really need to antisymmetrise in order to get zero identically
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top