A Show that set is an orthonormal set in PC(0,l)

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Show that set \{ (2/l)^{1/2} sin(n-1/2)(\pi x/l)\}^\infty_1 is an orthonormal set in PC(0,l).
Of course, I need to show that <\phi_m, \phi_n> = \delta_{mn}
&lt;\phi_m, \phi_n&gt; = (2/l) \int_0^l sin(m-1/2)(\pi x/l) sin(n-1/2)(\pi x/l)\, dx<br /> \\ = 1/l \int_0^l cos(m-n)(\pi x/l) cos(m+n+1)(\pi x/l)\, dx<br /> \\ = \left( \frac 1 l \right) \frac {l} {\pi(m-n)} sin(m-n)(\pi x/l) \Big|_0^l - \left( \frac 1 l \right) \frac {l} {\pi(m-n)} sin(m+n+1)(\pi x/l)\ \Big|_0^l<br /> \\ = \frac {1} {\pi(m-n)} sin(m-n)(\pi x/l) \Big|_0^l - \frac {1} {\pi(m-n)} sin(m+n+1)(\pi x/l)\ \Big|_0^l<br />

I used the trig identity:
2 sin \theta sin \psi = cos(\theta - \psi) - cos(\theta + \psi)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your question? The expression you have (you should check it out) = 0 for ##m\ne n## and =1 for ##m=n##.
 
mathman said:
What is your question? The expression you have (you should check it out) = 0 for ##m\ne n## and =1 for ##m=n##.

Thanks for the reply. When I looked at it, I could swear it's zero in both cases. Let me check again.
 
<br /> \\ = \frac {1} {\pi(m-n)} sin(m-n)(\pi x/l) \Big|_0^l - \frac {1} {\pi(m-n)} sin(m+n+1)(\pi x/l)\ \Big|_0^l<br />

When you evaluate at x = l and x = 0, the argument for sine is either zero or a multiple of pi. When m = n, there's an indeterminate form in the common term.
 
When m=n, I suggest you don't use the cos identity, but use the original form, where the integral is ##2/l\int_0^lsin^2((m-1/2)(\pi x/l))dx##.

I think you have some errors in the derivation. You have the product of cos terms, rather than the difference, although this seems to have been corrected for the next line. When you integrated the cos (m+n+!)...) term, you divided by m-n.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top