MHB Show that the area of the rectangle is....

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Rectangle
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
There's a rectangle which the length is x+1 and the breadth is x.

X is $$-1\pm\sqrt{11}$$

Show that the area is $$11-\sqrt{11}$$

The workings I have done for far are below.

$$(-1\pm \sqrt{11})*(-1 \pm \sqrt{11} +1) $$

$$(-1\pm \sqrt{11})*( \pm \sqrt{11} ) $$

$$(-1\pm \sqrt{11})*( \pm \sqrt{11} ) $$

$$(-1\pm \sqrt{11})*( \pm \sqrt{11} ) $$

Where have I done wrong ? And the square root of the solution of the area you are asked to show is a negative. A comment here would be appreciated.

Many thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Measures cannot be negative, so we must have:

$$x=\sqrt{11}-1$$

And so:

$$x+1=\sqrt{11}$$

So, what is the area?
 
MarkFL said:
Measures cannot be negative, so we must have:

$$x=\sqrt{11}-1$$

And so:

$$x+1=\sqrt{11}$$

So, what is the area?

$$(-1+ \sqrt{11})*( + \sqrt{11} ) $$

$$ - \sqrt{11}+ 11 $$

Correct? :)
 
Why would you multiply the expression representing the area by -1?

edit: I see you edited your post. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Why would you multiply the expression representing the area by -1?

edit: I see you edited your post. :D

(Party)(Party)(Happy) Thank you very much MarkFL
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top